this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
934 points (99.7% liked)

politics

19930 readers
4339 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is the very essence of the difference that should exist between a President and a King. From Federalist 69:

The President of the United States would be liable to be impeached, tried, and, upon conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors, removed from office; and would afterwards be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law. The person of the king of Great Britain is sacred and inviolable; there is no constitutional tribunal to which he is amenable; no punishment to which he can be subjected without involving the crisis of a national revolution. In this delicate and important circumstance of personal responsibility, the President of Confederated America would stand upon no better ground than a governor of New York, and upon worse ground than the governors of Maryland and Delaware.

The failure of the Republican party to support this kind of check on Presidential power is why we're having this crisis now.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

"Well, when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal"

-- Richard Nixon, 1977.

You've had 47 years to do something about this, to be able to hold your leaders accountable, and apparently it wasn't worth the effort.

I guess the upside is you won't have to worry about all that wasteful election spending any more. 👍

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 hours ago

You don't understand (or maybe you do but aren't saying it). The Nixon scandal is what started the modern shitshow as we know it. Nixon's supporters would be royally pissed that there was no specific media apparatus to fully support Nixon and his shit. They would go on to fight to repeal the fairness doctrine and to start Fox News and the modern propaganda media as we know it.

BTW, a few years ago (during Trump's first administration or a bit after) they even SAID 'when the president does it , it isn't not illegal' or some slight word difference as a way of signalling their ultimate victory in trying to do what they wanted to have happened during Nixon's scandals.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

Oh, they’ll still allow that spending to show how many votes he gets next time. Like the other dictators do.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I mean, the constitution never said the supreme court has the power of judivial review, the supreme court at the time just grabbed the power, and congress at the time just went along with it. The supreme court only held on to the power because of "norms and traditions". Today's congress could simply just pass a resolution declaring the supreme court has no such power, and all that 200+ years of "norms and traditions" is gone. And all the law enforcement, national guard, and military people would just be like "seems legit" and go along with everything trump decrees.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

UNLESS they rule AGAINST Working Class Bailouts. THEN the Courts SHOULD be Listened to!

[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 hours ago

Once again, to no-one's surprise. Trump loudly claimed he would do this long ago

Choose a felon as President, expect him to commit crimes... enjoy

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

Dear Americans, where are your protests?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 hours ago

There's protests in every state. The media is just ignoring them.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 hours ago

the mainstream news isn’t covering them… they also edited out people booing trump at the super bowl and edited in cheers

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 hours ago

There are more people on the streets when a new iphone is released

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CileTheSane 4 points 2 hours ago

You need more disruptive protests.

Americans have been trained to clutch their pearls but that disrupting commerce with protests is wrong and that's exactly what we're seeing: complaints but no disruptive action so they are easily ignored.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

It is written into their plan, not a surprise at all "ignore the courts".

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

These are unamerican people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

And people voted for this!! I feel like I'm in some fucking fever dream.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

This isn't the failure of the Republican party. This is their victory dance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Seriously, this has been the Republican wet dream for decades.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Groundwork for a coup by the sounds of it. When the next election is supposed to happen I wonder if he'll declare martial law due to some invented issue.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Groundwork for a coup by the sounds of it.

GROUNDWORK??!!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 hours ago

~~Groundwork for~~ a coup by the sounds of it.

fixed it

load more comments
view more: next ›