what?
stinky
That feels like backpedaling to me. Can you explain why you find it interesting? Do you find articles critical of Trump's administration interesting? Do you have any credentials or credibility or are you just lazy-thumbing propaganda at strangers hoping to ruffle feathers?
Further, what metrics are you using? Do you have any sources of information other than the journalistically bankrupt propaganda machine you cited?
Do you have anything of value to share, or is it all "just interesting" and nothing more?
If you don't respond you're admitting that your ideas don't stand up to scrutiny.
when the rich wage war it's the poor who die
You needed to put that in the title so we know what you're talking about
Feels like a heavily subjective analysis. Are you just sharing articles you like and then giving your opinion about them?
Foolish. You've violated my instance's sidebar rules and I'll have to ban you. Good luck with basic human decency. 👋
What did she say and why did you share it? I'm not getting clickbaited.
I check in every day and I have a policy of lightweight moderation. Check my instance front page. I mostly just remove spam and ads.
Start with a fun hobby website. My first one was Pokemon. Here's all 150 of them, with pictures. Then add dynamic content. Then separate out the database layer.
If it's something fun and personal, you will want to do it. That's how you get the hours in
what it's just dogsBEE DOGS BRANDON IT'S BEE DOGS
^ this.
The president isn't in charge. He's existing within boundaries created by the wealthy.
In that case, it's strange that you find her performance so interesting when she suggests that parts of the existing constitution are unconstitutional. I guess I understand the novelty to you; it's sourceless opinion-dumping from an unqualified person.
I'll be blocking your community on my instance. We have standards.