streetfestival

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] streetfestival 9 points 2 days ago

I'm rusty but I believe the reason for the eviction dictates how soon it can legally happen. Eviction without just cause (e.g., renoviction, landlord's family moving in) is two months, starting the next 1st of the month (or week - whatever amount of time a rent installment covers). Tenant destroying the apartment is two weeks or less.

It sounds like your landlord is pulling some BS, and wouldn't have a much of a legal leg to stand on. But it also sounds like this place makes sense for you right now and you want to make it work.

My advice would be to try to come off as sympathetic, and a good tenant, and casually ask if you can defer payment:
Hi x, I'm enjoying this place, thank you so much.
May I get the $50 for y to you on [date]?
If necessary: I understand, but I'm stretched a little thin after first and last but can easily get it to you on [date].
If necessary: offer interest for deferred payment

I hope you can setup a good recovery environment and heal well after your surgery.

Good luck, friend!

[–] streetfestival 3 points 3 days ago

Very cool, thanks for sharing and thoroughly explaining the exciting news! I hope to hear more about how it goes trying to grow it on your balcony!

[–] streetfestival 3 points 4 days ago

Looks like an album cover 😎

[–] streetfestival 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Good to know, ty!

[–] streetfestival 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

By Andrew Coyne, published in The Globe and Mail December 14, 2024.

It was a good primer on this topic. I think the point that the LPC vacancy in these turbulent times - Dump as POTUS - reveals weaknesses in our political system with respect the PM's power, and should perhaps be cause for reflection, is a valid one.

Less interestingly, it's been ages since I read an article in The Globe and Mail. I basically had to hold my nose through the paragraphs about Trudeau - 2 to start - that were obnoxiously uncivil. Mr. Coyne wasn't that complimentary of the CPC, but he certainly wasn't as vitriolic. It was so icky to read in parts, which perplexes me

[–] streetfestival 4 points 1 week ago

Does it also come in Clark-Kimberly versions? :P

[–] streetfestival 21 points 1 week ago

Wow great read

[–] streetfestival 6 points 2 weeks ago

I think we also need more strategies to keep the trains moving, especially during rush hours. I think the most common reason I hear for unplanned subway downtime is "security incident" and "medical incident". I think the (increasing number it seems of) fare enforcement officers is bad spending. As a TTC user they're of no benefit to me, and I don't think they effectively reduce fare evasion either - I think the value is crap. I'd rather see security and medical/nursing personnel on trains or at stations to intervene sooner (security and medical incidents, respectively) and keep the trains running.

The crowding at St. George station is getting nuts

[–] streetfestival 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yup they're all pre-rolled joint tubes from a gov-regulated weed store in Ontario

[–] streetfestival 2 points 2 weeks ago

I bet he gets traded on his expiring but there'll be 4 or more teams on that trade. Salaries like Butler's don't typically move at the TDL and it's even harder to move them now with the new cap environment (1st and 2nd apron)

[–] streetfestival 1 points 2 weeks ago

The text you're reading is auto-generated by Lemmy when posting a link to a site that works nicely with that blurb feature, and a poster don't see it until the post is made

[–] streetfestival 1 points 2 weeks ago

Battle of two tanks who've recently found winning ways. If Zion's in and Poeltl and Olynyk are out, I think the Pels win. I'm looking forward to watching Zion (from the comfort of my couch - glad I'm not trying to stop him getting to the rim!)

 

And so, when a narrative emerged from corporate media and analysts that Trudeau had to go because he had moved too far to the left, I did a spit take: What in the universe are they talking about?

The members of Parliament (MPs) who made this claim mostly spoke under a cloak of anonymity. Global News’ David Akin reported, “Almost all of the MPs Global News spoke to believe Trudeau has moved the party too far to the left and that shift has played a key role in the decline of the Liberals.” Akin didn’t say who or explain how these MPs were defining “the left.”

How can it be that a prime minister whose tenure saw record-breaking corporate performance paired with widening social inequality is also “too far to the left”? What kind of left-wing doctrine supports extreme income inequality and a tax structure that has failed to redistribute profits?

No one could reasonably believe that Trudeau’s economic policy was too far to the left. What they’re really saying is that Trudeau’s vibes were too far to the left.

486
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by streetfestival to c/canada
 

In the worst region, bordering BC and the Yukon, extreme conditions increased by 1.8 days every year over two decades.

 

The labour board rules workers in different locations can bargain toward one contract covering them all.

 

Journalism in Canada is at its lowest ebb in decades, as evidenced by the cancellation or pausing of several post-secondary programs in the subject due to the dismal job market.

Postmedia Network, Canada’s largest newspaper chain by far, is 98 per cent owned by U.S. hedge funds and has had to sell assets and lay off workers to make payments on the hundreds of millions in company debt the vulture capitalists also hold. The corporation has steadily tightened its grip on Canadian newspapers since its creation in 2010, buying: Sun Media, Canada’s second-largest chain at the time, in 2015; Brunswick News, the chain that monopolizes New Brunswick, in 2022; and SaltWire, the chain that dominates the rest of the Maritimes, earlier this year.

Canada’s current second-largest chain, Torstar, was taken over in 2020 by private equity firm NordStar Capital, which has been stripping its assets and eviscerating its workforce. Last year, it converted 71 Ontario community newspapers published by its Metroland subsidiary to online-only publications, laying off more than 600 workers in the process. It then cheated them out of the severance pay they were owed by taking advantage of our bankruptcy laws.

Our broadcasting industry isn’t in much better shape,...

 

Gina Rinehart, an Australian worth $30 billion and an avid Donald Trump supporter, has changed Alberta’s politics in her relentless pursuit of mined coal.

The saga offers more evidence on how the wealthy exercise their raw financial power to engineer democracy for their own economic benefit. Political scientists call the oversized influence of billionaires “the wealthification” of politics. Witness how billionaires dominated the U.S. presidential election.

In the last three years she has repeatedly sued the Alberta and federal governments and challenged regulatory processes. And even though three separate courts have found her arguments baseless and without merit, she continues to sue.

Two outstanding lawsuits, for example, contend the Alberta government owes her billions because her mining plans were stymied. Overwhelming public opposition to coal mining forced the government to impose a coal moratorium in the Rockies to protect critical watersheds.

Outside of provincial and federal courts, Rinehart has hired two lobby firms with ties to the United Conservative Party government to actively promote her open-pit mining project.

When it became clear that citizens living in the municipal district of Ranchland, where Rinehart wants to build the mega-mine, were overwhelmingly opposed to its construction, Rinehart actively participated in a dubious referendum sanctioned by Smith in the neighbouring community of Crowsnest Pass. Rinehart’s company even drove voters to the polls.

44
What animals do you like? (self.casualconversation)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by streetfestival to c/[email protected]
 

Name an animal (or several) you like and mention why you like it. No wrong answers!

 

TIL. I knew there were many vegetarians in India. I just learned that that vegetarianism excludes chicken eggs, which as a North American caught me off-guard. I looked at a couple webpages, which means I'm an expert on the topic now /s

https://www.thejuggernaut.com/eggetarianism-india-eggs-vegetarianism

Many assume that India is a country of vegetarians, but that’s miles from the truth: 69% of Indians eat meat, and about 23% are egg eaters. Of this latter group, 9% identify as “eggetarians,” or vegetarians who eat eggs.

https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/2601/why-are-eggs-not-consumed-by-many-hindus

Moral Reason: I have been taught that one reason such eggs are not considered suitable for consumption is that by preventing fertilization you are preventing the birth of an animal, which is considered unjust by some. The reasoning here is that blockading the creation of life is similar if not equal to extinguishing it.

Vedic Reason: According to Wikipedia's article on Sattvic diet, an unfertilized egg is considered Rajasic, or overly stimulating. Such foods are not to be consumed as they lead to an unfit state of mind.

 

Editorial on (still) wearing a COVID mask By Senator Paula Simons. Good read

view more: next ›