streetfestival

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] streetfestival 1 points 6 months ago

Nuggets @ Suns

[–] streetfestival 4 points 6 months ago

Love to all pikas and pika-lovers 🥰

[–] streetfestival 16 points 6 months ago

I can't comment on the mutation risk, but about 1% of people can't get vaccinated for medical reasons. So, persons declining measles and polio vaccines for conspiracy reasons put immunologically susceptible people at greater risk of contracting these previously eliminated diseases. Also, I think we have some obligation to protect children from conspiracy-crazed parents who fail to get their kids immunized. The effects of polio contracted in childhood are lifelong

[–] streetfestival 6 points 6 months ago

The case was brought by seven young people who argue Ontario's weakened emissions target violated the Charter.

They allege the target violated their right to life in part by committing Ontario to dangerously high levels of planet-warming emissions and discriminated against them as youth who will bear the brunt of the impacts.

Fraser Thomson, a lawyer representing the young people, says Ontario's application "opens the door to a generation-defining hearing before Canada's highest court."

The case dates back to when Premier Doug Ford's then-newly elected Progressive Conservative government repealed the law underpinning Ontario's cap-and-trade system for lowering emissions.

The government scrapped the system in 2018 and replaced the emissions target in that law — 37 per cent below 1990 levels by 2030 — with a new target of 30 per cent below 2005 levels.

The young people suggest the revised target allows for additional annual emissions equivalent to about seven million passenger vehicles.

[–] streetfestival 2 points 6 months ago

Right on. I'm realizing that I think I've overestimated sport betting's current market share in the landscape of Canadian gambling, because 1) I'm into sports and 2) almost everyone seems to agree that sports betting ads too common. They're still still smaller than land-based casinos, government online gambling, lotteries, etc

[–] streetfestival 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I agree quite a bit with you, but the new 'legal' sports gambling is private (and really under-regulated).

The government has clearly failed to regulate sports gambling advertising enough.

I would guess that sports gambling companies only pay the corporate tax rate. If so, that is bullshit and there should be added tax on gambling profits. This can help fund treatment, research, and awareness-building about problematic gambling

[–] streetfestival 3 points 6 months ago

Current governments (in Canada; e.g., Federal, Alberta, Ontario) seem very focused on protecting the current fossil fuel oligarchs and their profits and very underfocused on the green economy transition, sustainability, affordability, livability

[–] streetfestival 6 points 6 months ago (10 children)

Given the enormous stakes of our transition away from fossil fuels, I think we need more data - prepared independent of Western commercial interests - to conclude that tariffs (on Chinese EVs - I assume that's what you're referring to) aren't counter-productive. I do not trust Western automakers to prepare those data, and I would gladly to purchase an economical Chinese EV without any exorbitant tariffs myself. Otherwise, I'd buy an old ICE car. It's well documented how egregiously privacy-violating modern US-made cars are; no @#$%ing way would I buy one for $60k. I suspect we'll see a lot of NA automakers taking these EV funds from the Canadian government and deliver little in return. I'm not buying a flimsy Chinese boogeyman argument to prop them up and take them off the hook from innovating. China's leading the way in several sustainable energy endeavours as I understand it. Sure, there are a lot of problems with the country (like many other countries). I wish we'd focus on competing with them on sustainable energy efforts versus use protectionist policies that favour local corporations but disadvantage local consumers and slow down the divestment away from fossil fuels

[–] streetfestival 4 points 6 months ago

I agree I think that's a bit optimistic after decades of anti- (democratic) socialism and pro neoliberalism propaganda. Off the top of my head, I like working classes (plural) for inclusivity, solidarity, and clarity. I would hope that someone with some investments that still works paid employment for their income realizes that they have far more in common with the more narrowly defined working class than they do the oligarch class that's bent on stealing our social services and driving political narratives

[–] streetfestival 2 points 6 months ago
[–] streetfestival 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

This is a class war jfc

Totally. I think we need to coin a "war on the working classes" that will be useful in the messaging of what we expect from progressive governments. Because wealth inequality is at an all-time high and showing no signs of stopping and "war on X" language has historically been effective at getting people to recognize and understand structural issues

9
The Bike Lane Blame Game (www.thegrindmag.ca)
submitted 6 months ago by streetfestival to c/toronto
34
I never "radicalized" (social.bau-ha.us)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by streetfestival to c/canadapolitics
 

As a new paper from University of Calgary economists Trevor Tombe and Jennifer Winter shows, Canada’s carbon tax has added a grand total of 0.5 per cent to food prices. As Tombe noted in a long thread on social media, “that’s a tiny fraction of the 26 per cent rise in food prices in Canada over the past five years.”

This is important and useful academic research. It also comes limping along about three years too late to really matter in the grander scheme of things. Canadians are increasingly opposed to the carbon tax, and increasingly willing to blame it for the increase in food prices that has rocked households and economies across the developed world.

That’s largely a function of the Conservative Party of Canada’s aggressive campaign to paint the carbon tax as the source of all of Canada’s problems — and, by extension, their victory in the next election as the natural solution to them. There is no carbon tax correlation too spurious for the Conservatives to draw here, whether it’s rising food bank usage or declining per-capita economic prosperity.

-6
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by streetfestival to c/canadapolitics
 

Last week, the Liberal government announced a temporary pause on the GST for two months on an eclectic basket of goods that includes diapers, toys, beer, wine, Christmas trees, snack foods, and video game consoles. It also announced it would send GST rebates worth $250 to anyone who worked in 2023 and made less than $150,000.

All told, this gesture could cost the federal treasury as much as $7.7 billion. That’s money that could go towards any number of other priorities, whether it’s building more homes, investing more heavily in childcare, or expanding the new dental care program to more Canadians. It represents a striking failure of political imagination on the part of a government that desperately needs to start showing more of it. And it doesn’t exactly inspire confidence in whatever moves it might have left.

Even provincial New Democrats are trying their hand at playing the populist economic card using the language created by Conservatives. In Saskatchewan, for example, opposition leader Carla Beck is pressing the Moe government to “axe the (Saskatchewan gas) tax.”

As The Tyee’s Andrew Nikiforuk wrote in a wonderful — and worrying — analysis of the US election’s aftermath, this is a defining moment for progressives. “In many ways the Trump triumph, which may explode under its own contradictions, has provided the left with an opportunity to snap out of its incoherence and come back to reality. Maybe, just maybe, it is time for a visionary populist movement that challenges the concentration of money and technology with a practical plan for civilization’s survival. Maybe that is the only way to fight right-wing populism funded by techno-optimists.”

 

Ford has really ramped up the showmanship lately, calling for a bike lane witch hunt and making magical announcements about beer, highway tunnels and $200 cheques. Much of it, it seems, is being done in the service of getting us to look away from the reality of how things are going in Ford’s Ontario.

In particular, he’d really like us to pay no attention to the housing policy failure behind the curtain. But by the numbers, Ford’s failure on housing should be way too big to hide.

A report released last week by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation revealed that housing starts in Ontario are down 18 per cent so far this year. That stat, which measures the number of new housing units that saw construction get started, should set off loud alarm bells. Because housing, more than any other issue, has been Ford’s signature issue — the subject of lots of legislation. He’s styled himself as a builder-in-chief who will “get it done.”

This isn’t a case of Ontario’s large population skewing the numbers, either. For his excellent Data Shows newsletter, analyst Tom Parkin recently crunched the per-capita numbers for housing starts and found Ontario ranked eighth out of Canada’s 10 provinces. According to Parkin’s numbers, with just 34 new starts for every 100,000 people, Ontario’s rate of per-capita building was well below that of provincial peers like Manitoba (47), Quebec (47.8), B.C. (58.8) and Alberta (89.9).

With numbers like that, it’s no surprise that the province has dim hopes of hitting its much-ballyhooed goal of building 1.5 million homes by the end of 2031.

view more: ‹ prev next ›