streetfestival
As someone in their 30s who went back to university, I am seeing a lot of students use AI to summarize papers they were supposed to read for class or to write papers they were supposed to write for class. This is in addition to using the AI summary feature of a popular search engine as their default, if not only, means of looking up something they're unsure about.
It's often talked about by those that do it with a coolness about successfully skirting dumb rules. For one reason or another, it seems very reasonable to them. Maybe they see it as helping them with the onerous parts of school/ academia. Maybe they see it as the future, and current protests against it as silly.
More specifically, I'm seeing people use AI for things that are an area of weakness for them. By doing that, I think they're missing opportunities to develop those skills, and they will continue to 'miss milestones' so to speak.
I think, in general, people's reading, writing, and critical thinking abilities will go down over decades due to this behaviour. And that scares me. I think those skills are key to a rational electorate. E.g., Lack of such skills = Trump
Dude. If you want to look at pictures of women in bikinis, search for them online. There are lots out there. The community you created is weird and suggests you have very few interactions with real women. Many women users complain that Lemmy/ Mastodon/ the Fediverse is too male-dominated and they don't feel all that welcome here. We need to change that. Suggestion: delete the misleadingly labelled 'chill out zone' community and setup a women in bikinis community on lemmynsfw.com (the porn one). Maybe I'm guilty of moving sexist content from instance to another, but I'm trying to be constructive
You are correct. I'm not really much of a casual conversation person myself, so I don't think I'm the best person to moderate it. I moderate other communities and actively contribute to Lemmy. Someone else might see my comment and think, "hey I'd like to do that"
Posts like this are an indication we need a casual conversation community on lemmy.ca. This isn't a c/Canada post imo
If you get your Canadian news from an American owned propaganda network I think you have a very strong belief system and a very strong disregard, if not contempt, for facts. I think the ignorance makes them feel good, feel in control, feel coherent, and they are fanatics for it. Not rational actors. Not informed citizens. Fanatics. How else can "Fuck Trudeau" and the other glaringly false, overly simplistic, and/or ignorant Conservative talking points be so compelling to them?
Lyndon B. Johnson, former President of the US, hit the nail on the head in the 1960s. He's correct about people's thinking far beyond anti-Black racism amongst White people.
I'll tell you what's at the bottom of it. If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you.
I don't know about "most areas" but, yeah, I think you're referencing the numbers provided by Alberta Medical Association's president to the Canadian Press yesterday. Vaccination rates are why some are predicting measles will become endemic [in North America, I think] again - maybe 40 years after Canada had declared it beaten.
https://lemmy.ca/post/42929323
https://www.thecanadianpressnews.ca/health/alberta-doctors-association-warns-measles-will-rise-ramped-up-health-campaign-needed/article_3c997808-f122-5d9f-9337-9cf5f6e0a5e6.html
Duggan said the province doesn’t have a high enough vaccination rate to prevent measles from circulating - a rate that is ideally above 95 per cent. She said even in urban centres like Edmonton and Calgary the rate is only at around 70 per cent, and there are pockets of the province that are at 50 per cent or lower.
@[email protected] this article, and McGill's medical program apparently, are very racist by Canadian standards. I don't think I've ever read something that icky in a racist way in a contemporary Canadian publication
The City itself is pro bike. It's the province (DoFo) that's anti bike and wants to tear out the bike lanes. The City may be considering congestion pricing, which is when cars driving on busy streets or in certain areas are charged a road usage fee ($5, $10, etc) via cameras that snap license plates. This has existed in London for 20 years and NYC implemented it recently
Care to explain that a bit? I'm not that familiar with BRICS beyond the first paragraph of its Wiki page