The technology is used to separate art from artist. How it is being used is inherently problematic. The tool is problematic. Refusing to acknowledge that doesn't make it any less true.
There are myriad ways for children to create and enjoy art. Punching a text string into a machine that vomits out stolen work is not art.
I'd have a lot more respect for you if you just owned up to that you don't care and you just want to use it instead of whining about reactivity and some nebulous concept of accessibility.
You're on notice.
This is such a bad faith argument, AI does nothing but enrich the wealthy, as has been pointed out elsewhere in this thread. Everyone should have the opportunity to learn to create, you're intentionally ignoring the root cause here.
No, it isn't.
Slice of cheese on top.
Cool post! Never knew it was competitive
My fault, it read as advocating for the wealth transfer. Stealing isn't enough of a signal unfortunately, banks and lenders and brokers view retail investors with contempt.
Great, more AI slop no one wants or asked for.
Not sure why you're getting downvoted, you're right. Kids calling 911 is what gets first responders on scene. Until kids in America can attend school without the threat of gun violence, banning phones is not an option.
That's a rhetorical question, right
Agreed. That it's some great equalizer is deception, as a tool it exists to widen that class divide.