Antiwork

1844 readers
1 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
1
2
3
4
 
 
5
 
 

cross-posted from: https://reddthat.com/post/48461867

When Luigi Mangione was arrested for the alleged murder of the CEO of UnitedHealthcare in December 2024, public reaction shocked observers. Far from universal condemnation, many people expressed support. This was especially true among younger people, with polls showing 41% of young adults viewed the murder as acceptable.

So what leads the average person to justify extreme violence? Our recently published research, in the special issue “Understanding violent extremism” of the APA Journal Psychology of Violence, locates the answer in one increasingly widespread phenomenon: workplace burnout.

Mangione’s manifesto cites “corruption and greed” as a source of frustration, a sentiment that resonates widely amid growing dissatisfaction with modern work environments. Recent research shows that broader patterns of systemic frustration and perceived corruption are associated with burnout.

Our study, which took daily surveys from over 600 employees, suggests burnout may quietly fuel worrying attitudes – specifically, the potential justification of violent extremism – towards the perceived source of their distress.

6
 
 
7
 
 

Microsoft said that employees who spend three or four days in the office have higher Thriving Scores — a metric that measures employee well-being.

Personally, when my company started forcing everyone back to office three days per week, I quit. I hated it so much. Because it affects my entire life.

I dont want my coworkers and bosses to be part of my life. I didnt pick them, I dont like some of them, and there is a huge feeling of hierarchy all the time. It sucks.

8
 
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/17969421

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/17969420

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/17969419

• An international urban village for families & travelers based on 'gift'. • You can live there permanently or temporarily. • They have 30 rooms.

Read more about it. ↓

https://ecovillage.org/ecovillage/well-yokodai/

https://www.well.yokodai.org/?lang=en

Tradeless Earth https://tradelessearth.wordpress.com/

9
 
 

I just clocked 16.25 hours.

10
 
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/17484162

• Sadhana Forest is based on Gift economy and ecological revival.

https://sadhanaforest.org/

•https://www.youtube.com/user/sadhanaforest

Hi there, Tradeless Earth is trying to work towards a peaceful, stronger, just and equal society by holding hands with individuals and communities to work together and be connected.

https://tradelessearth.wordpress.com/

11
12
13
 
 
14
9
submitted 2 years ago by paddythegeek to c/antiwork
15
240
Scummy things (lemmy.ca)
submitted 2 years ago by SariEverna to c/antiwork
 
 

Not sure if this is the best place for it, but here we are. The Indeed listing is already gone, so I can't refresh my memory, but they'd made it sound more like a customer service role. The grammar was a bit of a red flag, but I thought it could have been second language issues, so let's see where this goes. Thanks for wasting my time, guys! And apparently the time of around sixty other people if Indeed is accurate about that. I can still report your job posting even though it's gone, though, so that makes me feel a little better.

16
 
 

I want to explore this thought more and its biased to post this in antiwork however i think itll be a good insight to see what people think of employers in here

17
54
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/antiwork
 
 

Bit frustrated at my workplace currently, hope memes are allowed here

18
19
228
"rat race" (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/antiwork
 
 
20
47
The process line (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/antiwork
 
 
21
38
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/antiwork
 
 
22
157
Winnie the pooh (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/antiwork
 
 
23
60
The wageslave (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/antiwork
 
 
24
25
 
 

The theory that many people feel the work they do is pointless because their jobs are "bullshit" has been confirmed by a new study.

The research found that people working in finance, sales and managerial roles are much more likely than others on average to think their jobs are useless or unhelpful to others.

The study, by Simon Walo, of Zurich University, Switzerland, is the first to give quantitative support to a theory put forward by the American anthropologist David Graeber in 2018 that many jobs were "bullshit"—socially useless and meaningless.

Researchers had since suggested that the reason people felt their jobs were useless was solely because they were routine and lacked autonomy or good management rather than anything intrinsic to their work, but Mr. Walo found this was only part of the story.

He analyzed survey data on 1,811 respondents in the U.S. working in 21 types of jobs, who were asked if their work gave them "a feeling of making a positive impact on community and society" and "the feeling of doing useful work."

The American Working Conditions Survey, carried out in 2015, found that 19% of respondents answered "never" or "rarely" to the questions whether they had "a feeling of making a positive impact on community and society" and "of doing useful work" spread across a range of occupations.

Mr. Walo adjusted the raw data to compare workers with the same degree of routine work, job autonomy and quality of management, and found that in the occupations Graeber thought were useless, the nature of the job still had a large effect beyond these factors.

Those working in business and finance and sales were more than twice as likely to say their jobs were socially useless than others. Managers were 1.9 more likely to say this and office assistants 1.6 times.

"David Graeber's 'bullshit jobs' theory claims that some jobs are in fact objectively useless, and that these are found more often in certain occupations than in others," says the study, published in the journal Work, Employment and Society.

"Graeber hit a nerve with his statement. His original article quickly became so popular that within weeks it was translated into more than a dozen languages and reprinted in different newspapers around the world.

"However, the original evidence presented by Graeber was mainly qualitative, which made it difficult to assess the magnitude of the problem.

"This study extends previous analyses by drawing on a rich, under-utilized dataset and provides new evidence.

"It finds that working in one of the occupations highlighted by Graeber significantly increases the probability that workers perceive their jobs as socially useless, compared to all others. This article is therefore the first to find quantitative evidence supporting Graeber's argument."

Law was the only occupation cited by Graeber as useless where Mr. Walo found no statistically significant evidence that staff found their jobs meaningless.

Mr. Walo also found that the share of workers who consider their jobs socially useless is higher in the private sector than in the non-profit or the public sector.

More information: Simon Walo, "Bullshit" After All? Why People Consider Their Jobs Socially Useless, Work, Employment and Society (2023). DOI: 10.1177/09500170231175771

view more: next ›