Science Memes

12067 readers

1583 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

500

explosions (mander.xyz)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 245 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Can't see the other side- if it's a 2 dimensional representation of a 3 dimensional object in can still be accurate because of perspective.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 2 months ago (4 children)

There's a third dimension now?

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Not really, but it's a useful assumption for lots of different types of maths.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

As long as everything you imagine in 3D space is spherical

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Quaternions make a whole lot more sense when you imagine a third spatial axis and use them to rotate a hypothetical 3D object.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

This is madness!!!

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yes, time is the third dimension.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Always has been

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Yes, and now some bozos are even discussing a 4th dimension. Something to do with chess, I think.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago

My thoughts precisely, they are just assumimg this is just a 2D circle, when in reality it's more likely to be a 3D sphere. They aren't accounting for the area of a 3D object, we don't even know the thickness of the "slices" that are flying.