117
‘Not in my backyard’ pushback blocking much-needed affordable housing, experts say
(www.thecanadianpressnews.ca)
What's going on Canada?
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Hockey
Football (NFL): incomplete
Football (CFL): incomplete
Baseball
Basketball
Soccer
💻 Schools / Universities
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
🗣️ Politics
🍁 Social / Culture
Rules
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
Just offering the solution. If you don't like it, you can KEEP not getting housing. I moved out into the woods to be able to afford the house that I have. The fact that you won't even posit that as an OPTION is telling. You want it your way, or no way. Well guess what...you're not getting it your way, so you're gonna have nothing.
Car-dependent sprawl only happens when the ONLY thing you're building is housing. If you use zoning laws to ensure that you get enough businesses in the area, then it's not car dependent any more and you're just beginning your own little city in a place where there isn't one already.
You don't have to start in an ALREADY established city.
I could go about this stuff for hours, I could literally throw the book at you, but I haven't because life demands that I not spend it arguing with strangers on the internet. I do know that you were at 14 down votes, and I thought your comment was a little older. I'm not accusing, I'm sincerely asking: Did you delete your old comment and make it again to shake off the downvotes?
Huh? No, it's still there at -17. My reply wasn't ever at -14; but my parent comment was.
Oh, crap, nevermind, I got wicked confused. Sorry about that!