this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
453 points (92.8% liked)

politics

19916 readers
3882 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Also, it's wild just how unpopular NFL is on Lemmy - there's just not a whole of discussions at all, even about the halftime show.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well considering a lot of the discussion on here is around tech and specifically Linux that doesn't surprise me. Very online tech people usually aren't that interested in sports.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Did you see that ludicrous display last night?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What was Wenger thinking sending Walcott on that early?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

The thing about Arsenal is they always try to walk it in.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

The only Ludacris I saw was the commercial he did during the half time

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because it’s American capitalism 💸💰and jingoism 🛫🇺🇸💣 at it’s finest.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

thank you for the little pictures, now i understand :)

[–] adarza 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i flipped the game on for a bit. one play, two commercials. i was done.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I searched "Superbowl 2025" and just refreshed that result every so often. Zero commercials, and the score and quarter time was up to date.

[–] adarza 4 points 1 day ago

i went back later and basically did that once, saw the score partway through the 3rd. i had no doubt that the falcons collapse eight years ago would not be topped.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

As an Eagles fan, I fucking loved that shit. But I can understand why Chiefs fans would have not enjoyed it, and everyone else would have been bored.

Kendrick fucking killed it, though. That was a great halftime show.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Fun fact: ~~unpopular is not antonym to popular.~~

~~Unpopular implies active dislike or hate. Antonym to popular is "not popular", which also includes stuff that is not actively hated, but simply ignored.~~

ok, i confused my message by unneccesarilly and incorrectly bringing too narrow meaning of the word antonym into it.

so: unpopular is not the same as largely ignored. just because there is not that many fans of sport on lemmy, being created largely of tech-people, doesn't mean it is unpopular, as unpopular implies active dislike, which is not the case here.

to save some googling for anyone interested:

so we have so called polar antonyms, such as cold / hot or strong / weak, which do not cover whole spectrum of choices (there is some middle ground between hot and cold).

then we have complementary antonyms, which create two disjunct sets covering whole spectrum. these are basically logical negation.

they are often created by using a prefix from the other word. american / non-american, mortal / immortal, but also entrance / exit.

the terminology also differs between languages, it definitely does between my native language and english.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposite

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

i edited my message for better clarity

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your description makes unpopular the antonym to popular.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

i edited my message for better clarity

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Sports is boring. The games are vaguely entertaining if you're actually playing them, but watching? Washing dishes is more engaging.

Hell, CSPAN is a better watch.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Im glad you have your opinion but I respectfully disagree. Sports can be a good time to watch for certain people, but dont rag on it just because its not your cup of tea.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder what the Venn diagram of people that think watching sports is boring compared to the people that think watching video games streams is boring is like?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

I'm in the minority where I'd rather watch friends flounder at a game than a professional gamer's stream

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

John Cleese said it best, the only imaginative part of american football are the ad breaks.

Watch rugby.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I always preferred CFL rules tbh

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Congo has football!?

[–] adarza 3 points 1 day ago

me too. it is a much more entertaining game.