this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
532 points (98.9% liked)

World News

41150 readers
4334 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump sharply criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, calling him a "dictator" and accusing him of corruption, aligning his rhetoric with Russia’s stance.

His remarks followed a phone call with Vladimir Putin and reflect his long-standing skepticism of US support for Ukraine.

Trump’s "America First" policy prioritizes reducing aid to Kyiv while shifting focus to China.

While some Republicans voiced concerns, Trump is wielding total authority over his party.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 152 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Absolutely fucking disgusting. This idiot has basically destroyed western geopolitics in a matter of weeks.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 days ago (7 children)

It's almost as if we should require IQ testing for candidates. And you know, maybe don't let felon rapists run for office.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It’s almost as if we should require IQ testing for candidates.

Look, I get your sentiment, but we've been over this sort of thing. If we let that happen, this is the sort of shit that the fascists would implement (and put themselves in charge of scoring, which would certainly result in their allies passing and everyone else failing):

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That is an outrageous test, there are like 5 questions that could be construed in multiple ways. Hopefully you don't lose points for explaining your reasoning..

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

Hopefully you don’t lose points for explaining your reasoning…

Oh you sweet, summer child. Read the instructions:

"Do what you are told to do in each statement, nothing more, nothing less."

If you try to explain, you already failed.


Also, by the way, this is the grading rubric:

(This is not hyperbole. This is how it actually worked in Louisiana in 1964.)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

you have 10 minutes and the people grading you don't want you to pass.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What kind of place takes pride in its absurdly high illiteracy rates, and seemingly does everything possible to maintain them?

(I'm guessing a racist one)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

White people either weren't given this test, or were given a passing grade regardless of what they did.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why wouldn't someone not want you to pass? Makes no sense

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because they're racist and you're black.

That's it, that's the real, whole reason. This test was actually used, back in 1964 in Louisiana. This is how black people were disenfranchised.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Aah, racism. I knew I was missing something.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

The test was given to uneducated people, and they had to pass it to be allowed to vote.
The test was worded ambiguously on purpose, so the people grading it could decide who gets to pass.
The people grading it were election officials in Louisiana.

You can guess what skin color they had, and what skin color the people who usually "failed" the test had.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You got ten minutes to do all of it, not sure you're explaining anything.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Even attempting to explain violates the instructions and is thus an insta-fail. Clearly, you do not understand what "nothing more, nothing less" means and are therefore illiterate and ineligible to vote, according to this test.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

The most amazing(ly vile) one is using the tendency of our minds to skip over “the the” as if it’s an IQ test.

Well that and the whole idea of using this stupid collection of badly worded instructions to “determine” a human’s worthiness.

“Determine” with the assistance of that family guy “OKAY / NOT OKAY” card.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

"They're eating the dogs" wasn't enough of an IQ test?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

We need a cleaner media environment. The current one is fucked.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Or maybe just give a shit about primary education and raise the iq of the voting populous above that of the common slug.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

IQ testing for voters.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Agree in concept.

However making Felons/Rapist unable is an easy way for Trump to stop competition. All he needs is a conviction for his opponents in the courts he owns.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Hey let's maybe not try to fix ignorance with eugenics

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This idiot or the 77 million idiots that voted for him for second term?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah the 77 idiots that voted for this are just as responsible. I'm going to go further and blame anyone who posted or memed pro trump shit. I'm never letting my dad forget how much of an idiot he is for supporting this shit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Agreed on all points, and I’m absolutely not surprised.