Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
There is a process called "learning how to learn."
Essentially its a series of questions or question-templates you ask to gain deeper understanding of something beyond what the source material you are learning from provides.
The basic versions of them include "how" and "why", where the "who", "what", and "when" matter less in most cases (and if they matter more, it will be extremely apparent).
Then, listing out every answer to each of those questions you can possibly think of and testing them against logic and evidence.
"How do apples fall to the ground?"
Warping of spacetime?
flat disc that we stand on accelerating through space?
The pull of the aether?
You would then test each of these ideas by gathering evidence and eliminating others. Eventually in the example through rigorous testing, logic (including mathematics), you'd come to the correct conclusion of the warping of spacetime.
Then, if you are trying to come up with new ideas, you apply this method of thinking to the unknown and reverse it a little. Take facts and evidence that exist, and ask the same questions against the unknown. For example, if you're writing a story, the who and the what become important in the reversal, but the how and the why stay relevant.
"What would the main character do after they realize they were betrayed by the grand duke of blahshire?"
Who+Why: what are the main characters beliefs and convictions? What drives them?
How: What kinds of actions has the main character taken in the past? Have they grown since then?
What is the current sociopolitical climate that the story is taking place in? What kinds of behavior is expected of the main character and those around them? Are things like revenge frowned upon, or is not exacting revenge considered weakness? Maybe both depending on who you ask?
You can also apply this to general ideas, making yourself or a project/concept/etc. the main subject.
This kind of thinking is a muscle you have to exercise until it becomes natural. Eventually you start doing it without realizing.