this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
307 points (99.4% liked)

politics

20567 readers
4740 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 50 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

I work in the corporate side of retail for a large company. I promise you not a single vendor is absorbing the tariffs, but a few are getting around it by just moving production for the US market to other factories they already own in Southeast Asia.

These companies were already afraid of the Chinese government absorbing them and moved "headquarters" to Singapore. This isn't hurting them, it's hurting us.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 19 hours ago

I promise you not a single vendor is absorbing the tariffs

I've tried to explain this to every person I've come across, and they simply don't understand that corporations with record breaking profits aren't simply gonna absorb the cost of the tariffs and are going to try to squeeze blood from a stone--aka try to get it out of you. The worst that's gonna happen is they post a few down quarters and end up absorbing a small percentage of the overall tariff until the buy pressure comes back.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 19 hours ago

Which is the entire point. All of trump’s actions are designed by his owner to hurt us.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I promise you not a single vendor is absorbing the tariffs, but a few are getting around it by just moving production for the US market to other factories they already own in Southeast Asia.

Often not even moving the production to other factories. The tracking on this stuff is comically underfunded and underserved. You can absolutely make a widget in a tariff country, like China, stamp it "Made in The Philippines" or Indonesia or wherever, and move it into the US without paying the tax.

These companies were already afraid of the Chinese government absorbing them and moved “headquarters” to Singapore.

Given the degree to which Singapore is beholden to Chinese owned and operated businesses and falls within the operating range of the Chinese military, this is more a Hong Kong style bureaucratic loophole than a real escape from China as a sphere of influence. Its like banking out of Bermuda while you work in the United States. A legal fiction that gets you out of a certain degree of taxation/regulation, but does nothing to shield you from the Coast Guard or the FBI.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Doesn't stop them passing the "tariff charges" on regardless if they actually have to pay or not

Don't be surprised if these companies suddenly show 10-25% increase in net profits.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

That’s the whole point. Raise the price on things and then American producers can compete.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Why tariffs are stupid in three acts

Act 1

American producers: I can’t compete with that $10 foreign product, I have to sell my product at $12 to turn a razor thin profit.

Politician: ok I’ll slap a $5 tariff on the foreign product to protect you.

Act 2

American producer: awesome so now the foreign product costs $15! I can compete

American consumer: oh well I guess I can spend $12 instead of $10… sucks but America first I guess

Act 3

American producer: no need to leave $3 on the table, let’s sell ours for $14.99, I need more profits because everything I want to buy with my profits is now more expensive for some reason.

American consumer: the foreign one used to cost $10 and the domestic one cost $12… now they cost $15 and $14.99. I guess I’ll buy the American one and skip dinner tonight.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

To be clear, I think it’s a shit idea and we know (since Elon is running things) the execution will be awful. Tariffs are almost always a shitty idea and will cause nothing but inflation. But that’s the point for Trump. It’s a stealth tax increase.

The only times I think tariffs are good is if:

  • Another country is subsidizing an industry with the goal of creating a monopoly on something essential.
  • You have an infant industry that’s viable at scale but it needs time and investment to scale up but it’ll be competitive once it does
  • Frienemy national security situations with unreliable trade partners (to wildly over-simplify, if you import all your guns and bullets from a frienemy and your exports to them are fancy purses, you probably need a domestic producer of guns and bullets more than they need a fancy purse industry.)
  • Something wild like a stupid, unjust war initiated by a madman. But that never happens, right?

But it’s always, in the end, a tax on your citizens and there are almost alway better ways to go about it than tariffs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

They'll still manufacture overseas as long as they can cause of shareholder value