this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
1144 points (98.5% liked)

196

2529 readers
2779 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (5 children)

while I support Canada boycotting the US, you have to admit this in particular is "freedom fries" tier patriotism. it was embarrassing then, and it is embarrassing now.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Depends. Tongue in cheek it's pretty funny.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would agree if this was Mexico doing it as a response to the gulf thing... then it would have made some sense in context.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago

I'll take one Mexicano please. /s

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you not heard about the tariffs and threats of annexation from Trump?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yes. Please refer to my original comment, once again, clearly in support of boycotting the US in actually meaningful ways. I say this would be more understandable coming from Mexico because then it would be a jab, against the US unilaterally trying to rename the Gulf of Mexico, so it would make sense to rename something named after America(ns) in return.

"Oh, you did tariffs and threatening annexation, I shall no longer call this coffee Americano" just doesn't follow logically. And compared to the threat it is the weakest, lamest, most pathetic form of protest imaginable. That's my point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

You are being too literal.

A better analogy is to say that it's as lame as Freedom Fries, but it being aimed at the country that re-labeled the French Fry, so that makes it ironic and much funnier.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

We changed the nane of a product because you haven't joined us wilding an unjustified war on brown people

vs.

We changed the name of a product because you waged an unjustified trade war against us for no reason, even tough we have been your closest alley.

Not the same.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago

You understand how despite the differences in justification, someone can find both examples cringe, right?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didn't question motivations. I already said I support boycotting the US. this is not a method of protest that does anything. it's lame and stupid. Americano is not even American, nor is it Canadian. it's just dumb. it's like saying you remember watching Canadian Pie as a teen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I didn't say it isn't. i said it's not American, as in it doesn't come from the US.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

Americano is not even American

I mean that's a pretty specific phrasing.

I said it’s not American, as in it doesn’t come from the US.

Those are not the same things, but i know what you mean now, so thanks.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

If politicians are pushing this particular change, it would be a bit cringe imo but I chuckled when I saw it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Agreed that it would definitely be much worse, and maybe I wouldn't have found it as cringe if I hadn't seen the push for "Freedom Fries" back in the day.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah, no. If you didn't support their pointless wars back then, they would call you a traitor. Fuck me for not wanting my friends to die.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 23 hours ago

You could not support their wars, and also not stoop to their level of pettiness.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't understand what this has to do with anything I said.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The "freedom fries" 20 years ago occurred because France did not want to support our stupid middle eastern wars. That spawned the stupid movement to stop calling them French fries. If you were not pro-war in the US in the early 2000's, a lot of people would suggest you were unpatriotic.

That is why they said. Because you brought it up.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

I know what Freedom Fries is. That's why I brought it up. I don't understand how that's relevant to my comment that calling Americano Canadiano is dumb.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Except back then the US was the aggressor, and now the US is the aggressor. I wouldn't equivocate "you don't want to blindly follow me into a pointless war" to "you're targeting me in a trade war"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

My point is that neither name change actually sends either message. They're both weak and pointless, literally inconsequential and completely self contained. Imagine the French being ... hurt? annoyed? ... that some fuckwits on the other side of the world don't call fries French Fries... as if they gave a shit before. Same here.