this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
142 points (99.3% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

2699 readers
9 users here now

Rules

  1. Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
  2. When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
  3. The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.

The usual instance-wide rules also apply.


Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

alt textA screenshot shows a new linuxsucks community on the sh.itjust.works instance, a screenshot below it showing the moderator of the community getting banned five hours after its creation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Was there anything wrong with c/[email protected] ? Maybe madthumbs has other grief with lemmy.world, I'm not sure.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It was an unpopular shitpost community.

As a Linux user, I can enjoy memes about real problems with Linux, but his posting went beyond memes and straight into hate boner territory. He once said something about how open source is bad because a company charging money for services creates jobs.

Anything other than circle jerking about 'Linux bad Windows good' got you banned.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So, it was a problem with the community moderation then. The new community is moderated by the same person, no reason it will go any different then.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Exactly. He's just looking for a place to stake his little fiefdom where he can circle jerk about how bad Linux is, no matter how incorrect he might be. There's no implying that Dear Leader is wrong, just stroke or get banned.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

The moderation not so much the content was what was wrong with it.

Linux needs criticism and you hear the voices of the less tech savvy if it wants to grow its user base and gain wider adoption, similar to lemmy. But if that discussion is a bad faith, "Linux is bad and you can't change my mind" posts, with enforcement via moderation, then it's not useful to anyone really.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I use Linux and I think a lot of the criticisms are not only valid, but often hilarious. Everyone who uses Linux has funny stories about fucking up their system doing something they shouldn’t have.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

I've totally done some things with dd which could have been in an episode of Silicon Valley.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The moderation of the community or the instance? Madthumbs is also the mod at [email protected]

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In This specific example, the issue was purely with the community and sole moderator.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Ok, so the new community will not change anything in that regard.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It was more Kauffman esque performance art.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

I think that's the sad part. They got into genuine flame wars with people. The stuff they'd reply was 100% dead serious and sad. Nothing fun or hilarious in an ironic way. Just angry and sad.