this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
649 points (98.4% liked)

News

27735 readers
4443 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Michigan farmer Rebecca Carlson, a longtime Trump supporter, faces bankruptcy as Trump’s funding freezes stall a $400,000 USDA grant for hiring temporary workers.

Carlson, who hoped Trump’s second term would revive her struggling cherry farm, already spent $200,000 preparing for labor under the H-2A visa program.

With funding halted, she risks losing $200,000 more and can’t move forward with critical hires.

Trump’s new tariffs and immigration crackdowns threaten agriculture costs and labor availability, leaving farmers uncertain and frustrated with unmet promises.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 327 points 2 days ago (5 children)

So let me get this straight: she had everything planned and set up under the policies of the Biden administration, everything was working fine and a large part of the plan were immigrant workers. So naturally she voted for Trump. I struggle to empathize, tbh.

[–] [email protected] 144 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Struggle to empathize? I'm reading this with glee.

[–] [email protected] 76 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

In Dutch we have a saying: "Wie zijn billen brand moet op de blaren zitten" ->( if you burn your asscheeks, you have to sit on the blisters). It means that if you do something stupid, you have to suffer the consequences

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In the english speaking world, we say, fuck around and find out. I feel sorry for people like this... until i realise this is literally what they voted for. Suck shit arsewipes.

[–] [email protected] 106 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's only half-topical, but let me say one thing: farmers are romanticised waaay too much in my opinion. Yes, they usually have a more precarious business, and agriculture as such is, of course, very much the foundation of our societies and very lives.

But don't be blinded by the image of homesteading and such - most farmers are basically just business owners, with their class interests often removing them from a large part of the population. Many of the seasonal workers for example have shit pay on top of shit conditions, and they are notoriously overrepresented with some kind of "rurally wholesome" image, when they can be just as much business assholes, that mainly own a piece of land and the machinery necessary to use it for agriculture.

This will only get worse, because bankruptcy like this has one main effect: consolidation, even more farmland operated by big business, even though I personally think small business like this one is clearly already not as good as people tend to make it out as.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 2 days ago

People romanticize farming because it was the basis of society and its economy 100 years ago. Agriculture was key to human survival for millenia before that.

In our increasingly tech driven lives, there's something pure about your work being dedicated to cultivating the earth and bringing sustenance to people.

But there are modern US farm owners that harken the image of plantation owners during America's chattel slavery era. Exploiting undocumented workers with undignified working conditions and paying them insufficiently in exchange for irreversibly wearing down their bodies.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago

Agreed, and to add to this, I grew up in farmland and have never met a broke farmer. These folks are typically quite wealthy thanks to massive government subsidies. Huge modern home, brand new cars, plenty of toys like ATVs. They're not living the same life as the standard working class.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The fundamental weakness of Western Civilization is empathy, after all.....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Its a musk quote. Pretty sure others have said it before him though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Ahh, I didn't know.

Terrifying lol

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Do you want to hate yourself both literally and philosophically? Seek out the news coverage from your closest Sinclair affiliate. There's a good chance this is more attributable to the fall of the fourth estate than any sort of ignorance or stupidity. A lot of these people get their news from the local broadcast. And when Sinclair controls all of those they cannot help but be uninformed.

This is actually a chance for us to reach out to them pointing out the failure of the media they relied to be informed with. Or we could choose to not build allies and coalitions and just laugh at them. For things that we ourselves could easily fall victim to

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

they cannot help but be uninformed.

Bullshit. They've had way too long to figure out that reality doesn't match up with the news they're getting. It's just easier to not question it

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Their reality is legitimately different from your own. And as long as you refuse to acknowledge that. You will just push them to cling to their lies as much as you are clinging to your own.

By virtue of simply being here both of us are not typical or average. A lot of typical average people still don't use the internet and don't even rely much on cable. When everything around them tells them that reality is one particular way. And in general it doesn't often negatively impact them they'll believe it. Now when the cognitive dissonance is really hitting is the best time to break them from it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I lived in the rust belt for over a decade and have spent the vast majority of my life in a very conservative district. I literally know farmers personally. I promise you I know what life is like for many of these people. It's nice to think that we could push or pull them but they're as willfully deluded as it gets. The number of people I know that could barely afford gas to get to work and then continue to vote Republican in deep red districts for decades as they stripped them of any kind of benefit is insane. There is no reaching out to them they already rejected reality. I've had so many conversations with individuals about politics in these areas and you can see them rejecting reality when you point out examples from their real life. They can help being uninformed and choose every day not to. They know the politicians they voted for took they're benefits and they're going to vote for them again because that's easier than facing the reality that they made their own bed. Trying to reach out to them is why the Dems are pushing right and trying to coax Republicans to their side and the willful indoctrination is why that has not, and never will, work. These are proudly ignorant people

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A lot of these people get their news from the local broadcast. And when Sinclair controls all of those they cannot help but be uninformed.

Lived in a rural area, cannot confirm.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've lived in a rural area and can confirm. Not all rural areas are in the thrall of propagandists like Sinclair. However far too many are. I know of at least three or four different markets that from personal experience don't have any news other than Sinclair's. And I know how much I have to struggle to keep family and friends there informed.

You and I generally agree on most things. And I have a high enough opinion of you that I think that you can recognize and acknowledge that your experience while valid. May not be universal. Also none of this absolves in from their role in any of this. But the best way for us to reach them is with understanding and not accusation here. We've got Decades of evidence that contemplation and ridicule is only going to make it worse.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Man, where I lived, the most basic television package had multiple non-conservative news channels, and people always tuned into Fox anyway. They didn't turn on the radio and tune into nerd shit which was available like NPR, they tuned into Rush Limbaugh screaming about how Muslims were treated with kid gloves in this country (in the mid-2000s, no fucking less).

At some point, you have to accept that these people are not choosing conservative news sources because they don't have alternatives; they're choosing conservative news sources because they like what they're listening to, and because they dislike hearing the opposite.

We’ve got Decades of evidence that contemplation and ridicule is only going to make it worse.

What ridicule? Fuck, man, conservatives have been given nothing in this country but asspats and 'agree to disagree' for as long as I've been alive. "T-the mean liberals made fun of people like me on a liberal show..." as all the liberal talking-heads and community members gather 'round and tell them how fucking valid and wholesome they are doesn't mean jack fucking shit.

Humiliation and isolation is the only weapon that works against fascists, other than violence. We learned that in the 60s and 70s, and then got told otherwise by Very Important People in the 80s, looking for reconciliation with fascist cunts in order to share in the power during a brief revival of right-wing power - which then turned that brief revival into an enduring trend.

The Nazis in Germany weren't suppressed because the post-war order joined hands with them and told them that they were good boys and girls who just made some mistakes. The Nazis in Germany became verboten when the generation of the 1960s looked at the former generation and said, "My God, you were monsters."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Right there. There's your problem. For most of these people there's only one TV package and that's ABC, CbS, NBC, and whatever couple of quirky local UHF stations they still get. And when two if not three out of those three major network stations are owned by Sinclair. Then they get no alternatives. Plenty of places don't get cable and tv packages. Plenty of places can only get satellite and it's spotty at best. Even then if that is also an extreme luxury.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Plenty of places can only get satellite and it’s spotty at best. Even then if that is also an extreme luxury.

Satellite was always the expensive option where I lived, in one of the poorest regions of the country. Satellite, furthermore, covers less than 10% of households, and that includes people opting for satellite as the more expensive option in cable-accessible areas.

Nowadays, ~95% of the country has internet access - in actuality, not 'could get it if they wanted'.

At some point you have to accept that people are choosing the information sources they want to listen to, not simply restricted by the machinations of others.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're still arguing past the point though. What does the internet do for most of these people that local radio and TV technically hasn't or couldn't?

Also possibility of access is drastically different from actually having access. Having access is also drastically different from actually using. I have friends and acquaintances that 100% unironically use their phone for phone calls only. Outside of using it as a camera some. I guarantee that their service plans all have data included.

Further, people can and often do still live without owning a computer or accessing the internet. I don't know how. I can't. They'll continue to do so until all traditional broadcasting is ended. Yes the internet can replace all of that. But it hasn't. Even then it's a wickedly double edged sword which has led even more into even more extreme indoctrination. So it's hardly a panacea.

Right now many of these people are struggling with the biggest case of cognitive dissonance they've ever had. It's the perfect time to strike. And plant the concept that they're being lied to, by all their local broadcasters. The evidence is there, they're seeing it. We could talk to them about it like adults. Or we could accuse them of things they aren't doing. Gloat and ridicule them for internet points. Causing them to retreat and double down, being just as bad as they are. Letting the oligarchs continue to divide us and win.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You’re still arguing past the point though. What does the internet do for most of these people that local radio and TV technically hasn’t or couldn’t?

Nothing. That's my point. They have access to other news sources. They choose the ones that they like to hear.

Also possibility of access is drastically different from actually having access.

Nowadays, ~95% of the country has internet access - in actuality, not ‘could get it if they wanted’.

Further, people can and often do still live without owning a computer or accessing the internet.

Some 5% in this country. I somehow doubt they're the majority of conservatives in this country. I, in fact, would go so far as to doubt that they're significant politically at all.

Right now many of these people are struggling with the biggest case of cognitive dissonance they’ve ever had. It’s the perfect time to strike. And plant the concept that they’re being lied to, by all their local broadcasters. The evidence is there, they’re seeing it. We could talk to them about it like adults.

That's the line that I've been hearing for at least 20 fucking years now. It didn't work when Iraq was proven to be based on lies, it didn't work when Obamacare fearmongering was proven to be based on lies, it didn't work when Trump's entire first administration was proven to be built on lies. It didn't work with COVID - it didn't work with antivaxxing, it hasn't worked with jack fucking shit.

We've tried talking to them like adults. Again and again and again. "One more time" is the motto of the fucking Dem Party on this issue, and that's been failing for 30 years.

Maybe "We just need to sit down and have a talk with literal Nazis" isn't the winning strategy it sounds like.

Or we could accuse them of things they aren’t doing.

Bruh, every accusation I've leveled thus far is absolutely things they are doing.

Gloat and ridicule them for internet points. Causing them to retreat and double down, being just as bad as they are. Letting the oligarchs continue to divide us and win.

Maybe validating the ones simping for the oligarchs isn't actually fighting "The oligarchs continue to divide us and win", but actually strengthening their hand? Just a thought.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nothing. That's my point. They have access to other news sources. They choose the ones that they like to hear.

Then share your citation. That's a broad specious claim. There absolutely are some like that yes. But I have yet to see any studies showing anything remotely similar.

Nowadays, ~95% of the country has internet access - in actuality, not ‘could get it if they wanted’.

Again, citation for this?

Maybe "We just need to sit down and have a talk with literal Nazis" isn't the winning strategy it sounds like.

Which is why, if you'll note. I never suggested that.

Bruh, every accusation I've leveled thus far is absolutely things they are doing.

I never claimed otherwise. Just that those sorts are not as representative as they're being portrayed.

I know for a fact that ridiculing those acknowledging the cognitive dissonance. Will 100% divide us and push them back into the arms of the propagandists.

No one is suggesting we do this to any conservative / Republican Congressman or elected official. Fuck each and every one of them completely. They 100% know what they're doing. Or any conservative personality for broadcaster. They're even worse generally. Or any gleeful little cult member. But only to those average people who acknowledge a Divergence in what they were told and reality. You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. And while this leopards/faces thing is silly and cathartic. It absolutely will not reach any of the reasonable still reachable ones. Of which there are plenty. Just making enemies of them all the more sure

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Then share your citation. That’s a broad specious claim. There absolutely are some like that yes. But I have yet to see any studies showing anything remotely similar.

My citation for... the fact that people with the entire internet at their fingertips must, necessarily, choose right-wing sources in order to receive right-wing sources, and are not constrained by the availability of other sources, since the internet has a vast selection of sources to choose from, and right-wing media constraints a la cable or satellite don't play into it?

... are you being serious right now?

Again, citation for this?

90% by broadband subscription in 2021, 96% by usage in 2024

Which is why, if you’ll note. I never suggested that.

Right now many of these people are struggling with the biggest case of cognitive dissonance they’ve ever had. It’s the perfect time to strike. And plant the concept that they’re being lied to, by all their local broadcasters. The evidence is there, they’re seeing it. We could talk to them about it like adults.

I never claimed otherwise.

Or we could accuse them of things they aren’t doing.

I know for a fact that ridiculing those acknowledging the cognitive dissonance. Will 100% divide us and push them back into the arms of the propagandists.

Oh, cool, so what will asspatting those experiencing cognitive dissonance do?

Oh, it reminds them that there are no consequences for believing things that make them feel good? And it signals to others that there are no consequences to believing in things which make them feel good, no matter how terrible those things are?

But only to those average people who acknowledge a Divergence in what they were told and reality. You miss 100% of the shots you don’t take. And while this leopards/faces thing is silly and cathartic. It absolutely will not reach any of the reasonable still reachable ones. Of which there are plenty. Just making enemies of them all the more sure

You seem to think that, after a decade of open fascism, there are reachable ones left.

The fucking Cheneys are out of the cult. The Cheneys. The. Fucking. Cheneys. Romney and McCain (Rest in Peace/Piss) are RINOs to most in the party. There are literal golden idols set up to Trump.

The number of 'reachable' ones left are very small, and live in a fucking hole in the ground. And attempting to reach them by normalizing the vast majority of conservatives with polite discourse about how it's okay that they were wrong and they can still change will create more unreachable converts with normalization of fascism, far more than any number of the 5%> that you find who were really just ignorant, and not feigning ignorance to fit their ideological urges.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Nope, it’s a choice to uninformed. Stop making excuse for dumb asses.

Plenty of people choose to actually be informed on actual policy, and use critical thinking to figure out what it means for society.

They’re racist, anti intellectuals who choose to be fed bullshit cos it’s fits with their poisonous, dumb ass racist ideology of “immigrant bad”

Stop making excuses for them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

I don't struggle to empathize. I'm downright gleeful these people are getting the instant karma they so rightfully deserve.