this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
632 points (97.4% liked)

World News

45708 readers
2175 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The plan would replace the $600 million in subsidies Denmark gives the island each year

The Donald Trump administration is reportedly considering giving about $10,000 to each Greenland resident as part of its plan to annex the island.

The possibility would seek to replace the $600 million Denmark gives the territory in subsidies every year, and has stopped being mere rhetoric to become official U.S. policy, according to The New York Times.

The outlet detailed that the plan already includes several cabinet departments and that the White House's National Security Council has met several times to advance on it, recently sending specific instructions to different offices.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Why do we need Greenland? Is it so we can easily attack Russia or something? Isn't Alaska pretty fucking close? Like what is the reason for annexing Greenland?

[–] [email protected] 53 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Mineral rights and control of what will be a major shipping route as the North opens up due to climate change.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fuck that's insane. Makes perfect sense but holy shit. I fucking hate this planet and this country even more.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

No it doesn't make sense. Unless there is a grift.

Because in the past a company could negotiate for passage and minerals.

But this time a countrys leader wants to get in on that wealth and grift.

So it makes sense only if some asshole abuses their power for greed.

This all sucks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I meant fucked as in our politicians are, despite what we think, thinking generations ahead to the point they've accepted the consequences of our actions and know there's no going back and therefore looking for ways to monetize the future bleakness that is our world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I worded what I said poorly. I agree with you, it makes no sense. Short term thinking. I was trying to say that they could do all sorts of horrible things in the old fashioned way, not draw much attention and not much complaint. They could accomplish their short sighted plans without all the drama and scrutiny.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Especially since some of Greenlands resources would replace resources the US military purchases from CHYNA.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Do we really need to repeat trumps limp humor here? Its spelled 'China', Brad.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Climate could play a part, too.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There is a shipping route opening up that would enable Asian-Europen-American trade via a about 2/3 shorter route than currently possible. It would make any route through the Suez canals or around Africa pointless. This might not sound important right now, but it would fundamentally change the fortunes of countries and reshape the world.

https://www.thearcticinstitute.org/future-northern-sea-route-golden-waterway-niche/

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago

Greenland and all the areas surrounding it know this. They will not be giving Greenland to America.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Probably many greedy reasons, but my personal favourite speculation: annexing Greenland surrounds Canada and stops any potential aid by its NATO allies in case of an invasion, since annexing Canada is one of the stated objectives of the US now.

In terms of strategy for actual national security, they already got all the access they wanted, if they wanted more all they had to do was ask. If they're the ones doing the attacking of a common ally, though, they wouldn't get that access. So it's only of added strategic value to annex instead of maintaining the alliance if the goal is to attack members of the alliance.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Ressource deposits.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Trump definitely won't attack Russia. Vladimir Putin is his bestie.

I think Putin is uncomfortable with a NATO country in that strategic position, so he has manipulated Trump into thinking that it would be a good "real estate deal" for the US to take it over.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If they pollute enough to finish melting the north pole , it open a new trade route. And the pollution part is already plan with coal mining and fracking.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I think it's strategic for when he pulls the US out of Nato, of course he will want the resources as well.