this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
56 points (96.7% liked)

Hardware

1751 readers
166 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

TSMC holds the world by the balls. There are no other foundries like TSMC. They're so big and so important they're virtually the only reason why the US spends billions maintaining a military presence in the South China sea to hold China at bay and defend Taiwan. If they want to tell Trump to suck eggs, the only loser is Trump.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

If I recall the company that makes the machines for fabs is even more a monopoly as they’re the only people making them. I think they’re Dutch.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What I don't understand is that there are a lot of billionaires with deep DEEP pockets. Why don't they invest in a competitive chip fab elsewhere? Why doesn't the CCP make their own equivalent chip fab?

Catching up when you can reverse engineer is usually much much easier than innovating. This has been part of China's business model for years, so why doesn't it work for advanced chip fab?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well, looking at a microchip under a microscope might reveal a lot about how Intel/AMD/Nvidia design their chips. But it's not going to tell you how those chips were then constructed.

That's extremely specialised knowledge requiring very advanced technology and tooling that's globally only really available at TSMC. It's also so specialised that no one person holds all the knowledge in their head, it requires hundreds or even thousands of people.

But even if you figure that out, you still need to actually know how to build the tools that can manufacture wafers. And that knowledge is almost exclusively known to ASML, a company whose products can cost nearly half a billion dollars each.

China does invest in their own fabs, but even they purchase the (older-gen) tools from ASML. Compared to TSMC, they're 2 generations behind. Compared to ASML, they're 5 generations behind.

That's not to say they aren't innovating by the way. Huawei/SMIC developed chips that are only approx. 18 months behind using innovative techniques that gets more out of the older equipment they're forced to use. It's impressive stuff. But again, this does require the state to throw its full weight behind the initiative to create more domestic manufacturing, which a single billionaire is unlikely to manage on their own.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

So valuable to the point that if anyone, billionaire or invading nation tries to take over, they literally have self destruct built in

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/tsmcs-euv-machines-are-equipped-with-a-remote-self-destruct-in-case-of-an-invasion

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thank you for the detailed response! That's absolutely fascinating!

So does TSMC have some kind of exclusivity agreement with ASML, or is it for financial reasons, or is it mainly a personnel/knowledge issue that gives them their edge?

I suppose any effort to spin up a new fab is going to be behind the 8-ball immediately for a while while they deal with all the issues that arise.

One last thing: could you give some advice on how to get more educated on the topic? Any favourite news sources, or recommended readings, or is it just a matter of "seek and ye shall find"?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

So does TSMC have some kind of exclusivity agreement with ASML, or is it for financial reasons, or is it mainly a personnel/knowledge issue that gives them their edge?

It's all of those I suppose. Not many know how to use ASML's machines, not many have the means to purchase them and then there's export controls that prevent ASML from exporting the latest and greatest to China.

One last thing: could you give some advice on how to get more educated on the topic? Any favourite news sources, or recommended readings, or is it just a matter of "seek and ye shall find"?

Mostly "seek and ye shall find", though I also know a bit from a cousin who works for ASML.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

The market may not be suited for competition yet, because of the absurd build costs (mainly due to extremely specialised knowledge with limited transferability), I guess.

[–] avidamoeba 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

China has their own fabs - e.g. SMIC. They manufacture a lot of semis. They're currently doing 7nm. Meanwhile there's work towards a homegrown EUV machine that can unlock lower node. I think Huawei is planning to test theirs later this year. If theirs doesn't work, someone else's would. China has deployed significant capital and people to the effort so it's a matter of time until some team cracks it.