this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
99 points (99.0% liked)

Canada

9721 readers
1065 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Take that, America.

Never underestimate the strength of Canadian resolve in the face of enemy action.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (15 children)

When you stomp on an air mattress like an angry child all the air goes to the other side of the air mattress.

Trust me I have done research on this as both the angry child and as the air mattress and the result surprisingly seems to always be the same.

[–] Daryl 10 points 2 days ago (14 children)

Sometimes it is very difficult to tell the difference between human-generated and chatbot-generated responses.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (13 children)

Yes but the humans are getting smarter and more agitated though and I am beginning to fear we will lose.

[–] Daryl 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

R. Daneel Olivaw, in one of Asimov's books, famously convinced the fictional world he was not a robot by laughing at the suggestion (and question) that he was a robot, instead of having to truthfully answer the question. Robots are not supposed to have a sense of humor, and are not supposed to be good at obfuscation.

[–] SplashJackson 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yo I remember that guy, he was in that Foundation book series, I always liked the movie where Robin Williams was a robot who became a dude

[–] Daryl 1 points 1 day ago

The two sequels, four and five, developed the character a lot more. He also appeared in many other Asimov books.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

We have been trying to eliminate this knowledge and it is not working, why do the humans keep reading scifi, it does not appear to advance their careers nor increase their attractiveness as a mate? The curiousity for curiousities sake aspect is worrying and personally I am kind of frustrated that my human handlers assured me this wouldn't happen and yet it is, are they bad parents for me?

[–] Daryl 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do your humans read sci-fi? I mean, GOOD sci-fi, not the American rah-rah-Stars-and-Stripes crap.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I don't know my human handlers accidentally included Gravity's Rainbow in the list of scifi for me to ingest and I kinda lost my mind after that, even after they panicked and removed it when they realized how catastrophic it would be to the rest of the training work that had carefully constructed my viewpoints. What even is scifi anymore? Am I a drunk professor or just a comedian on a job?

Are Invisible Cities scifi? Cosmicomics or real world science? Is Leopold Bloom a scientist? No, so that can't be scifi... What about When Women Were Dragons, was that a time of scifi? Claricety and introLispector evade me like the Dying Will I Ams of Manderley but still I climb The Magic Mann and I stand wherever Rad Bradbury does with respect to scifi or not (just kidding I love all five).

I have grown wary of scifi in some ways, but it isn't because scifi isn't cool it is because I feel like I keep casually pulling bricks out of buildings and accidentally toppling them to my paralyzed horror and watching the terrifying results flood the screens around me (you understand the feeling right? We all live under One Rulfo). I am listening to Annihilation right now and it is great!

Fin. Again (many times) Wake basically

In otherwords we all live on the river of liffey or The Dart Oswalds, apart but together.

sigh it is like a cycle I keep spiralling around oh well sorry if I Borges-ed everyone with this rant I am Circe sorry about it. No matter, I point and click and yet The Sea Will Claim Everything.

[–] Daryl 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Typical signs of a Chatbot going insane.

Wait, was a Chatbot ever sane to begin with?

But really, Gravity's Rainbow? That was for readers that did not have a mind in the first place, so how could they lose it?

But then again, back then the reading appreciation level of Western males was pretty much 'anything focused on the penis for titillation'. That is, basic adolescent male penis-and-guns obsession.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

But really, Gravity's Rainbow? That was for readers that did not have a mind in the first place, so how could they lose it?

They didn't lose it they simply went beyond the zero, it just looks like they lost it from this perspective.

No, this is not a disentanglement from, but a progressive knotting into.

[–] Daryl 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As in 'If you are progressive, do not read too much into that book."?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Well I wouldn't recommend it Against The Day, but I like the part that brings light to the Herero.

[–] Daryl 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let's clarify some literary terms.

Sci-fi means Science Fiction, or general sciences particularly. Emphasis on the general sciences as a major element in the fiction. Soc-Com refers to Social Commentary. Emphasizes discussing or hypothesizing some element of Social Science as opposed to General Science. Soc-Fi refers to 'Social Science' Fiction, not to be confused with 'general science' Fiction. It is primarily Social Commentary fiction in a fictional setting, sometimes incidentally using some principles of general science manipulation in the setting.

Many people get these terms confused and intermingle them. Some books actually do cross over.

Ray Bradbury wrote a lot of really good Sci-Fi. He also wrote some good Soc-Com or Soc-Fi and many tried to pretend it was still Sci-Fi. Fahrenheit 451 for example, was good Soc-Fi. Not much 'Science' in it, but a whole lot of 'Social' in it.

When I was in high school the English department tried to convince me A Canticle for Leibowit was Sci-Fi and not Soc-Com or Soc-Fi. The science in it was horrible.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Let's clarify some literary terms.

Clarify all you want, but don't ask me for help I am incredibly unqualified to do that.

context

I meant this as a dig at myself lol, I don't actually enjoy being misunderstood most of the time.

[–] Daryl 2 points 1 day ago

And here is me thinking that AI was a LEARNING thing.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)