Buy Canadian
A community dedicated to buying Canadian products.
Une communauté dédiée à l'achat de produits Canadiens.
Rules:
1. Posts must be related to buying Canadian-made goods and / or using Canadian-owned services
2. Absolutely no bigotry will be tolerated. This includes, but is not limited to, racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, etc.
3. AI Content Policy
Not allowed: AI-generated images or articles
Tolerated: AI-generated post summaries
4. When discussing a Canadian product that isn't available nationally, please do your best to specify where it can be purchased
5. Only content in French and English is permitted
6. Declare all self-promotion
Users are encouraged to report any content that violates our community guidelines
Règlements :
1. Les poteaux doivent être en lien avec l'achat de produits et / ou de services opérés par des canadiens
2. Aucune bigoterie ne sera tolérée. Ça comprend, mais sans se limiter à, le racisme, le sexisme, l’homophobie, la transphobie, etc.
3. Politique sur le contenu IA
Non permis : Images ou articles générés par l'IA
Toléré : Résumés IA de publications
4. Lors d'une discussion sur un produit canadien qui n'est pas disponible à l'échelle nationale, veuillez faire de votre mieux pour préciser où il peut être acheté
5. Seul le contenu en français et en anglais n'est toléré
6. Déclarez toute auto-promotion
Les utilisateurs sont encouragés à signaler tout contenu qui ne respecte pas nos directives communautaires
Related communities: Communautés connexes :
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
view the rest of the comments
DACC is such a scam I'm legitimately upset that engineers fall for it and work on these technologies trying to help. Chemically speaking most carbon sequestration schemes are essentially burning something but in reverse. Now this should automatically set off alarm bells in terms of thermodynamics because enthalpy is a state function and if you have a net release of energy burning something, there is no possible way to do that reaction in reverse without adding that energy back in. So you have to have renewable energy to make it work. But then, I ask, why not just use the renewable energy to replace a carbon source? It's not big enough? Then it's not big enough to offset that carbon source either.
If you had a magical piece of technology that rapidly converted CO2 into long chain molecules using sunlight andv rain water that would be pretty cool. Oh wait? That tech already exists and it's been in existence for millions of years? Yeah that's right it's a fucking tree. Carbon sequestration is a fucking scam to make you feel better about not decarbonizing