this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
270 points (98.9% liked)

World News

47859 readers
2927 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

If the F-35 was made solely out of aluminium, like an equal-mass paperweight, the price of the raw material would be about 0.013 million USD per aircraft. In reality it sells for about 80 million. I doubt it's price will soar because of the cost of aluminum.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The super advanced electronics and engines are negligible, and so is the high level machining.
No what REALLY matters is that the cheapest part which is the raw materials, is increasing in price.

/s

I suppose this must be the thought process for the majority that downvote your obviously true comment.

PS:
IDK if the numbers are accurate, but the image they paint is.

[–] floofloof 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

People don't want to admit it judging by the downvotes, but there is nothing in the article that justifies the headline, and your point seems correct. If they were to pass the increased costs of importing steel and aluminum to the buyers of these military vehicles, the increase in price would hardly be noticeable. You can admit this without it meaning "I like Donald Trump."

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

The main buyer for these are the US government. There is no passing off the cost, there's just paying more for the same thing. The increase to material import costs is significant to the manufacturers of parts and assemblies.

I worked in aerospace manufacturing for about a decade. When aluminum prices went up during COVID due to supply chain issues, it in most cases, more than doubled the price of components we were making.

Often, a company will order say, 3 radio boxes. That could require 3 aluminum blanks to produce. Unfortunately, at small quantities, there's no price break on materials, and often if you only need 3 blanks, you still have to purchase 10 blanks of material as a minimum lot charge. That cost does go to the buyer. If they order 10 radios, there would be no change price, because of the minimum lot. If the cost aluminum of blanks jumps from $200 to $300 each just because of tariffs, then the total cost on one that 3 radio order jumps $700 extra on extra material.

It's a messy example, but when the prices change on the core items, everyone up the supply chain takes a chunk of that pie. If you're shooting for 12% profit, that 12% on the new tariff price for material from distributors, manufacturers, and any number of assembly processes up the supply chain. It all cascades.

But the big thing is that these aren't get sold to other countries en masse, so there is no passing it on

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Exactly the raw material cost is insignificant, what costs is the machining, assembly and quality control.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

On large batches like washers and screws, that's correct. A good chunk of these contracts are smaller orders where the BOM accounts for the bulk of the machining process. Anecdotally, when prices went up during the pandemic due to supply chain, our manufacturing costs for most of our aluminum orders doubled. You want a dozen radio control knobs? Sorry, machining only takes an hour, but material just tripled in cost, and you have to buy 120' minimum.

[–] SpaceCowboy 4 points 3 weeks ago

I don't think dump trucks filled with raw ore dump out materials into Lockeed Martin's parking lot and then they have some magical device that converts it into an F-35. I think it's more likely they purchase very specialized bits of metal that is produced at or above a specific grade. Producing materials to very specific requirements isn't cheap, and requires specialized tooling and training to do.

Yes you can refit mills and train people in the US to produce those bits of metal but that takes time and money to do. There's likely even security clearances people have to complete to see the specs on some of the materials.

And the significant investment needed to retool and retrain isn't happening because the investment crowd is in the TACO mindset.