this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
270 points (98.9% liked)

World News

47881 readers
3115 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] floofloof 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

People don't want to admit it judging by the downvotes, but there is nothing in the article that justifies the headline, and your point seems correct. If they were to pass the increased costs of importing steel and aluminum to the buyers of these military vehicles, the increase in price would hardly be noticeable. You can admit this without it meaning "I like Donald Trump."

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

The main buyer for these are the US government. There is no passing off the cost, there's just paying more for the same thing. The increase to material import costs is significant to the manufacturers of parts and assemblies.

I worked in aerospace manufacturing for about a decade. When aluminum prices went up during COVID due to supply chain issues, it in most cases, more than doubled the price of components we were making.

Often, a company will order say, 3 radio boxes. That could require 3 aluminum blanks to produce. Unfortunately, at small quantities, there's no price break on materials, and often if you only need 3 blanks, you still have to purchase 10 blanks of material as a minimum lot charge. That cost does go to the buyer. If they order 10 radios, there would be no change price, because of the minimum lot. If the cost aluminum of blanks jumps from $200 to $300 each just because of tariffs, then the total cost on one that 3 radio order jumps $700 extra on extra material.

It's a messy example, but when the prices change on the core items, everyone up the supply chain takes a chunk of that pie. If you're shooting for 12% profit, that 12% on the new tariff price for material from distributors, manufacturers, and any number of assembly processes up the supply chain. It all cascades.

But the big thing is that these aren't get sold to other countries en masse, so there is no passing it on