this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
349 points (99.4% liked)

News

30221 readers
4052 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a move that has drawn widespread condemnation from the scientific and medical communities, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. abruptly dismissed all 17 members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) independent Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) on Monday. He swiftly replaced them with eight new appointees—many of whom are known for their criticism of vaccines and for promoting misinformation.

This sweeping overhaul has raised alarm among public health experts, who warn that the nation’s vaccine policy infrastructure is now under direct attack. Kennedy appears to be acting with breakneck speed to consolidate control and institutionalize his public health agenda before meaningful resistance can be mounted against what many are calling a scientific counter-revolution.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (5 children)

So... what's the real endgame here? What's the agenda?

Is it strictly some mind bogglingly dumb but well intentioned effort to do what they genuinely believe is what's for the best of human health, with a complete absence of understanding of how to apprehend let alone interpret the most basic of scientific studies?

Could a large cluster of people really be that skull fuckingly brain damaged?

Or - and I'm very cautious to not claim this as fact - is there some actual further nefarious agenda at play? (Which I'm having a bit of a hard time articulating?)

Is it an "X superpower has dirt on the administration, and is pushing for things that will harm the US in order to comparatively increase their international standing and influence" kind of play?

Or some "make them even more weak, sick and bankrupt (and having less access to education and critical thinking), they'll be easier to control and manipulate" kind of play?

Or an "if we make public health even worst than it is now, we'll (somehow?) find a way to privatize even more health related see stuff? (I don't know what's left to privatize in US health though)" kind of play?

Or literally "we need to fight overpopulation, and the rich will always have access to healthcare and vaccines anyways, so push that shit to eventually kill the poor in droves"?

Fack

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm honestly leaning towards "skull fuckingly dumb", combined with a reckoning of how few idiots it takes to break the system.

Kennedy is a well established moron, so I don't doubt for a second that he could do this simply out of stupidity. A problem of its own is that a person appointed by the president (rather than hired by a qualified board) can even do this in the first place.

[–] TheBloodFarts 3 points 1 day ago

All comes down to rules and guidelines built around the assumption that people have integrity, a moral compass, and will be held accountable. Just so completely fucking naive

load more comments (3 replies)