this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
1087 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

71955 readers
3593 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

No one has been using aux cable mobile headphones for the past 10 years. Headphone jack is e-waste at this point. bluetooth audio is great and if you really want to be a boomer you can use the usb C headphones.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

how else are you supposed to connect it to cars that weren't made yesterday?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Headphone jack is e-waste

you can use the usb C headphones

What the absolute fuck are you talking about? What am I supposed to do with the dozen wired headphones I already have? Some of them decades old? Throw them in the garbage? Sounds real eco-friendly.

bluetooth audio is great

It is. We had it on phones since before the original iPhone. No one wants to take that away.

Problem is BT headphones last 2 years then they go in the garbage because the batteries are dead. How eco-friendly is that!?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Problem is BT headphones last 2 years then they go in the garbage because the batteries are dead. How eco-friendly is that!?

My 7 years old bluetooth headphone would disagree.

It is. We had it on phones since before the original iPhone. No one wants to take that away.

And no one except a vocal minority want to keep it. There are a lot on data on that, and manufacturer make their decision on that data.

But lets ignore that, and let's take my viewpoint as a customer. I don't want a port I have no use for. I don't want a DAC I have no use for. I don't want the extra weight that comes with them.

My needs conflict with yours, so what's the only way to make both of us somewhat happy? That's by making the 3.5mm jack an addon, which is what any manufacturer that does not focus on music listening would do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

And no one except a vocal minority want to keep it. There are a lot on data on that,

I would love to see the data that says everyone wants wired devices only. I don't believe you.

don't want a port I have no use for.

Why would you even care!?

I don't want the extra weight that comes with them.

😆 Buddy if you don't want extra weight you need to talk to these OEMs about making their phones out of giant slabs of glass. A 1g connector isn't going to make a difference. You're being completely ridiculous.

My needs conflict with yours,

No they don't. They can meet both of our needs by including a jack. Simple as.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm voluntarily exagerating my point here for irony sake.

My needs isn't more important than anyone else, but I wanted to point out the selfishness of the oposite point of view by making mine as selfish. Those in favor of keeping a jack port voluntarily choose to ignore any alternative, while trying to force their need on other people.

But it is true I do not want that port back. It is redundant, has no advantages over a dongle, and it inconveniences could easily be overcome by simply adding a second usb-c port. No need for internal DAC, you'd be able to do far more than you'll ever be able to do with a 3.5mm jack, and you'll be able to charge it while listening to your music with a wired headphone. All that with a smaller and more flexible port.

And it would take you 5min searching the web to get good review about usbc DAC with actually good sound, even better than any internal DAC.

But to save you a click, you have the Apple one, which has good review while being able to drive almost all headphones but the most energy intensive of them. It cost a whopping... $10.

As for the precise number, you can find them on market studies. Unfortunately they are quite pricy, and as I'm not in that field, I do not have access to them. But Fairphone does, and if they don't bother adding that port back, they are most probably basing their decision on them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 58 minutes ago) (1 children)

My needs isn't more important than anyone else, but I wanted to point out the selfishness of the oposite point of view by making mine as selfish.

There's nothing selfish here. Keeping the jack benefits everyone except Apple and other BT headphone OEMs. It doesn't hurt anyone else.

has no advantages over a dongle

The advantage is that you don't need a dongle...

and it inconveniences easily be overcome by simply adding a second usb-c port

Still requires carrying a dongle or buying a pair of headphones that only works with phones and computers, and not the vast array of other devices that still use headphone jacks, new and old. So that solves absolutely nothing. As I said elsewhere, we've created a competing standard, for no reason.

you'd be able to do far more than you'll ever be able to do with a 3.5mm jack

What? Do you think we're suggesting removing the USB port? What are you talking about?

And it would take you 5min searching the web to get good review about usbc DAC with actually good sound, even better than any internal DAC.

I don't want to search the web. I don't want a DAC. I just want to plug in my headphones. This is absurd.

It cost a whopping... $10.

$10 to buy something that previously cost me $0. Only it's inevitably going to get lost so you'd better buy a half dozen of them and replace them every few years, so you're looking at dozens of $ per year for something that was previously completely unnecessary.

As for the precise number...I'm not in that field, I do not have access to them

Yeah, I didn't think so.

But Fairphone does

Where? If you know they have it, then you must have it as well?

and if they don't bother adding that port back, they are most probably basing their decision on them.

No, they're basing that decision on the same thing everyone else is: money. Greed. Much like Apple they also released their own bluetooth headphones at the same time as they removed their headphone jack. But I suppose that's just coincidence, right?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Could also have been the other way around.

Fairphone removes the headphone jack > realize they would need an alternative > realize most TW headphones are e-waste to be > make their own with ~~blackjack and hookers~~ a removable battery, making it a solution to TW headphones with non-removable batteries.

Don't call fool without any proof, or you'll have a very sad life supposing the worst from anyone you'll meet. Coincidence is no proof of causation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Don't call fool without any proof

Brother, you're the one making claims without any proof.

Coincidence is no proof of causation.

Oh so you're actually naive enough to believe this is coincidence? I was joking earlier but you really believe it LOL.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You can use your dozen wired headphones you already have with a $10 usb-c -> 3.5mm adapter.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Tried that. Gets lost real fast. But thanks "freedom advocate".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Tried taking better care of your things? I’ve still got mine that came with my pixel 3 and my iPhone 11 Pro.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Okay so now this is my fault. Do you know how many adapters I lost before I needed one?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yes if they've lasted decades thats their job done. Now people are buying usb C headphones and there is no need to continue to support decades old standards. The ewaste from a pair of headphones is tiny so its not worth fretting over.

Also BT headphones last longer than 2 years. Mine are 1st gen samsung buds and going on 5 years at this point and still hold enough charge to listen to music during my work day. If im going to be using them all day I have 1 in and 1 charging in the case and then I can easily have music for 10+ hours on a 5 year old device. If I threw them away today I would consider them to have not been ewaste.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Yes if they've lasted decades thats their job done

No it means they'll essentially last indefinitely, unlike BT buds.

Now people are buying usb C headphones and there is no need to continue to support decades old standards

No, what's happened is that we went from a single open standard for audio jacks to competing standards (actually 3 of them before the EU stepped in and forced Apple to quit their bullshit). And gained nothing in the process.

The ewaste from a pair of headphones is tiny so its not worth fretting over.

It's not a pair of headphones, it's millions of audio devices.