this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
1914 points (93.2% liked)

Memes

46457 readers
1634 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
1914
2023-08-09.jpg (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 69 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (21 children)

I really wonder how americans were able to fuck this one up. There are three ways to arrange these and two of them are acceptable!

Edit: Yes, I meant common ways, not combinatorically possible ways.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Hmmm more like 6 ways but I get your point

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Three ways that people actually use. YYYY-MM-DD, DD-MM-YYYY, and MM-DD-YYYY (ew).

AFAIK no-one does YYYY-DD-MM, DD-YYYY-MM, or MM-YYYY-DD... yet. Don't let the Americans know about these formats, they might just start using them out of spite.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

YYYY-DD-MM, DD-YYYY-MM, or MM-YYYY-DD

What the actual fuck

'hey man, what date is it today?' 'well it's the 15th of 2023, August'

[–] Darkassassin07 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lmao, I want to try responding like this and see what the reactions are

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

I want to try this, too. Make it more possessive, though. The 15th of 2023's August. Really add to the confusion.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'll avoid those at all cost and go with the new standard of YY-MM-DD-YY. What's the date today? 20-08-10-23

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

whoa, take it easy there Satan.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Need more julian dates, YYYY-JJJ.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What, 2023-223 for the 223rd day of the year 2023? That... is oddly appealing for telling the actual progress of the year or grouping. No silly "does this group have 31, 30, 29 or 28 members", particularly the "is this year a multiple of four, but not of 100, unless it's also a multiple of 400?" bit with leap days.

You'll have oddities still, no matter which way you slice it, because our orbit is mathematically imperfect, but it's a start.

[–] ramplay 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So we need to correct our orbit is what I'm hearing!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

That'd be a wack premise for a crazy scientist story

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Twelve ways if you count two-digit years. My nephew was born on 12/12/12 which was convenient.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

for the americans, that's 12/12/12

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

Thanks bro, I was really confused

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

My grandmother was born in 1896 and lived to be 102, just long enough for the pre-Y2K computer systems in hospitals to think she was a two-year-old.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ouch!

I lost about an hour of my life trying to create a historical timeline in MS Excel. Eventually learned this is impossible with dates earlier than 1900.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

this guy does combinatorics

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

It's how the dates are typically said, here. November 6th, 2020 = 11/6/2020. [Edit: I had written 9 instead of 11 for November.] (We basically never say the sixth of November. It sounds positively ancient.) It's easy to use, but I agree that YYYY-MM-DD is vastly superior for organization.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Where is here that November = 9? Probably somewhere you've had a long day

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Oct = 8
Nov = 9
Dec = 10

In metric time there are only 10 months per year

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago (6 children)

We basically never say the sixth of November. It sounds positively ancient.

When is your independence day, again?

Anyway, in Australia (and, I suspect, other places that use DD/MM/YYYY) we use "{ordinal} of {month}" (11th of August), "{ordinal} {month}" (11th August), and "{month} {ordinal}" (August 11th) pretty much interchangeably. In writing but not in speaking, we also sometimes use "{number} {month}" (11 August). That doesn't have any bearing on how we write it short form though, because those are different things. It's not the defence many Americans seem to think it is of their insane method of writing the short form.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Saying it like that is no problem and not ambiguous. Writing it like that makes no sense though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It is a bit of a chicken and egg question though. Because do Americans not say it that way because of the date format or is that the date format because you don't say it that way?

Because in countries using DD.MM.YY we absolutely do say 6th of November.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

That's probably what happened. Though I do like starting with the larger context when talking about dates, but omitting it when talking about the current month or year.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm canadian and I've always prefered this format for the same reason. 11/6/23 is november 6th 2023, not the 11th of June 2023, that's weird.

[–] Zeragamba 6 points 2 years ago

As a different Canadian, I always use YYYY-MM-DD and a 24 hour clock.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Except that mm/dd/yyyy and dd/mm/yyyy can be ambiguous, I definitely prefer the former if I'm not using an ISO date. But normally I just write ISO and my head translates to MMM dd,yyyy

load more comments (18 replies)