this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
76 points (96.3% liked)

Canada

8181 readers
2812 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The industry's trade association, the Retail Council of Canada, said the new policy "unfortunately" targets large grocers exclusively.

"Which is impractical, as Canadian retailers lack direct control and influence over the global supply chain," said Michelle Wasylyshen, the council's national spokesperson.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jadero 27 points 2 years ago (2 children)

... Canadian retailers lack direct control and influence over the global supply chain...

I'm going to call BS on that one. Some of the largest retailers own many parts of the supply chain and exercise monopsony power over many other parts.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

Ikr, like you're telling me loblaws owned Zehrs cant cut down on their presidents choice (Loblaw) brand products shipped by loblaws transportation and logistics? They really have no control over that?

[–] EhForumUser 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

They have downstream control, but not upstream control. It is the upstream that is demanding plastic packaging here, particularly plastics which have transparency. For some reason they want to be able to see the food before buying it.

[–] jadero 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Obviously something I hadn't considered. On the other hand, we buy plenty of canned and boxed food without being able to see the food itself, so this may be just a matter of forcing us to adjust. Although I'm not sure that I can ever be convinced to buy most meats without being able to see it.

[–] EhForumUser 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

we buy plenty of canned and boxed food without being able to see the food itself

It is quite true that the upstream doesn't demand plastic for plastic's sake, it demands plastic only when it provides a real utility. Granted, even cans are typically lined in plastic and boxes often contain plastic bags to allow the product to remain self-stable and fresh. If the customer can't see the product, they expect some guarantees about its quality, and plastic can help with that.

[–] jadero 1 points 2 years ago

Ok, there is a lot more to it than I thought. As usual, there is always a lot more than what is obvious to the casual observer. Thanks.