-10
More than 3,000 auto dealers sign letter opposing Biden's electric vehicle mandate
(www.foxbusiness.com)
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
-10 points (14.3% liked)
Conservative
435 readers
56 users here now
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It’s hard to gouge your customers in the name of “service” when the number of moving parts on the vehicle are drastically reduced. Hardly surprising that they’d rail against something that cuts into their profits.
Running out of foil for that hat?
It’s not a conspiracy.
More moving parts = more service = more money. Less moving parts = less service = less money.
Care to be an ass about anything else?
So? You're still peddling utterly baseless conspiracies. The only ass here is you
Everything I said is logical and an easy conclusion to come to if you know anything about vehicles.
Come up with a counter argument instead of slinging insults. This is why nobody takes conservatives seriously. Grow a wrinkle and get back to me.
Just saying your conclusions are logical doesn't make them so
I’ve already shown you, broken down quite nicely for even the smoothest of brains to understand.
I’m not sure why I’m engaging with you at all, however; you don’t engage in good faith regardless of what I write.
I could splash you in the face with water and tell you you’re wet, and you’d still call me a liar.
You seriously need to grow the fuck up.
Warning: Rule 3, Bad Faith Comment
You immediately jumped to accusing them of being conspiratorial without asking them to explain their reasoning.
He made his argument perfectly clear. I don't know why I'm not allowed to criticize it
You criticized me, not my argument.