this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
14 points (85.0% liked)
CanadaPolitics
2707 readers
248 users here now
Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees
Rules
- Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
He knows his audience, and this audience doesn't give a damn what happens as long as their house value goes up and their property taxes go down.
Durham is...weird. Other than some very small pockets, it's like no one really lives there. Oh, sure, there's schools and strip malls and housing developments, but there is almost no industry outside of big-box retail: everyone is either in construction, or works in Markham or Toronto. There's little to no stake that anyone has in the community, outside of mercenary concerns about taxes, so as long as you keep the numbers going in the right direction, you're golden. The reason Liberal support collapsed is purely because of those mercenary concerns: largely a) inflation, and b) housing (being either unaffordable, or, perversely, dropping in value. Yeah, weird, I know...)
So when you have a community that doesn't care about the community except for the value of it, it's going to be ripe for the kind of politician that only talks about money. Social concerns come into it, but only couched around how they're costing you money. It's Conservative, but more Doug Ford conservative than Pierre Poillevre conservative.
Put it this way. Toronto has "citizens". Montreal has "citizens". Even places like Lanark County, Ontario, have "citizens". Durham has "taxpayers".
Right but the policies he's suggesting aren't going to keep their property values high or their grocery bills low. I'm not even going as far as expecting them to give a shit about social issues.