this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
90 points (88.8% liked)

Canada

8004 readers
1329 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not like it worked well with Barette or Couillard. The reality is that the people that want the position shouldn't have it, and the people that don't want the position should have it.

Power attract the people that shouldn't be in power. Simple as that.

[–] Poutinetown 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not all doctors make good politicians (for example, I doubt that Dr oz would be a good choice as a secretary). But good health ministers are more likely to come from a healthcare background, although you may have really good non-experts doing a ministers job.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I was a bit too sarcastic in my OP. I agree with you that someone with a background in what they administer is a boon.

But my point still stands. In almost all cases, the people vying for power positions are the wrong people for the job.

So the right person, someone that would be less influenced by power, needs to get chewed by their party and raise through the ranks. And if after all this ordeal, they still have their voice left in the party, then they make great minister.