this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
49 points (98.0% liked)
Casual Conversation
2084 readers
299 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 01/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Been training a bit of my drawing skill, mostly because I've been a volunteer drawing teacher at a public school. Classes are once a week and currently it's only 6 "hand picked" kids ages 8-9. After the mid-year recess, I'll probably take a second class on the morning.
My biggest challenge is trying to make all the abstractions of drawing more interesting and straight to the point, so I really can't sit them down to just draw ellipses and cubes to understand. Last week I tried to get them to draw a plushie giraffe using only simple shapes, it was clear they were aching to just draw the whole thing as they saw it.
Tomorrow, I'm planning some posing exercises with stickmen. The only thing I'll force them to do is ensure all stickmen they draw have clearly defined shoulder and hip lines, afterwards asking them to "finish" the drawings. Hopefully that'll keep them engaged.
I've only given 3 classes thus far, but this has been the thing that I've been most looking forward to since I began. I know that, at the very least, all those kids are now well aware that drawing isn't about talent, it's about training correctly. I should probably try a parallel with the training sports players do, since their training is usually 70% basic exercises, 30% short games