this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
192 points (97.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7452 readers
472 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Joe Biden has admitted that Israel has committed war crimes. That comes in a new interview for MSNBC, which should be treated for what it is: a confession, specifically a confession of complicity in genocide.

Why is Joe Biden, the 46th president of the United States, on the very eve of his presidency ending, publicly declaring that he had told the leader of a foreign state he has armed to the teeth for 15 months, to stop “carpet bombing” civilians at the beginning of an incessant genocidal onslaught? After all, Article 51 of the Geneva Conventions is very clear that carpet bombing civilian areas is a war crime.

He thinks this clip will lead historians to believe that actually he did remonstrate with Benjamin Netanyahu - that he did implore him to stop unleashing barbaric indiscriminate firepower against the innocent people of Gaza.

Well, this interview should be treated simply as an incriminating confession. If Joe Biden ever ended up at the International Criminal Court, this clip alone would be sufficient to find him guilty of complicity in grave war crimes.

Because it proves that Joe Biden knew exactly what the Israeli state was doing right from the start. Now Israel has been the biggest recipient of military aid of any foreign state in the post-war era, but in the year following 7th October 2023, that surged to nearly $18bn.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Admitting it now means you knew all along and did nothing. Complicit.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, but it's Joe Biden...he admitted to war crimes, but he didn't realize he was admitting to war crimes.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

Be fair. He did something. Enabling them is something.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Complicit implies he stood by and watched.

He actively perpetrated it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

No, the legal definition is complicit. He is guilty of complicity of genocide.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago

Damn Joe, it's a real shame there wasn't anyone who could have stopped them.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Yeah, woudla been great to have a Chris Hansen moment where the ICC came out from behind the cameras and he got hauled off to Europe for his war crimes.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago

Could have admitted that like a year ago and stopped shipping weapons.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago

He has admitted he Is a Zionist so another political stunt to save face

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

This should trigger the Leahy Law, but as we all know the law doesn't apply to Israel.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

I'm glad he literally Threw Away American Democracy to help commit War Crimes! That makes him a TRUE American and I'm SURE God will be pleased at the Pearly Gates!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

Thanks for nothing Joe.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

Such a piece of shit.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Burn in hell Biden. Preferably a Muslim one.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

I've said it before, and I'll say it again.

Genocide Joe. That is his name now, forever and ever. That is his legacy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

having such a fun time knowing nothing matters. /s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Two wrongs don't make a right.