this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
59 points (88.3% liked)

politics

19608 readers
4224 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I really hope Obama is playing some “keep your enemies closer” thing, but I am not holding my breath.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A masterclass in finding someone else at fault. Obama is used to being at fault. I'm sure he can take it.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago

Thanks, OBAMA!

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Fake smiles from Obama probably hurt trump's voters more than any angry discussions we have here.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

TBH I feel like agitating against fascism is much more effective than collaborating.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

A particularly loud belch out of Barron is liable to have more impact on those voters than we have here.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

remember when it wad said that obama couldn't get visibly angry and shouty, even when those reactions would be appropriate and deserved? it was because the image of the angry black man would have been pure oxygen to the racist and both sides blame game fire. and it looks like the same thing is happening here with some people thinking being "chummy" with trump at carter's funeral was some sort of acceptance message. it wasn't. in fact i think the same don't appear to be the angry black man rules apply here. it's not that obama didn't show trump the back of his head when they were close, it's that obama couldn't because then the story wouldn't be about the funeral. it would be about obama being rude to the president-elect, and trump would use that to claim even more victim status.

you can still hate someone and what they stand for and still be polite in a very public setting. this was a total non-story that corporate vichy media was trying to use to stir up controversy (which drives up clicks and views) which failed miserably. any outlet trying to revive said issue needs to be looked at skeptically for their reasons why it was doing so.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The ole blame Obama tag is back. The US is a joke

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

70 year old multi millionaire political analyst for Fox News writes a horrible opinion piece about the current situation. And it's taken as "News" by so many.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Can you believe he wore a tan suit one time?

Oh shit wrong photo

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They are in the same class. They go to each others weddings, they are chummy.

It's a class war, and we're losing...

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is Obama and Trump. No they don't go to each others weddings. No, they aren't chummy. Obama showed up and was classy as always.

That's all.

Churchill wanted Stalin killed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Given that he never followed through on that ambition in any meaningful way but he did play a significant role in millions of poor Indians starving to death I don't see how this story detracts from their point

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Churchill's genocide is independent from the idea that statesman will be polite in public that doesn't match anything else about their upbringing or beliefs.

The poster falsely equated Obama and Trump.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, they're both wealthy war criminals, there's a lot to equate there

The fact that their material circumstances are so similar probably contributes to how naturally it comes to Obama to normalize Trump by treating him with respect he doesn't deserve at public events like this

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

Obama is worth $3 million. Trump is worth tens of billions minimum (from Truth Social stock grift and meme crypto pump and dump).

Someone born poor and saved $3m by retirement is not the same as someone born a billionaire and still a billionaire.

Someone making minimum wage is 10x closer to Obama in wealth than Obama is to Trump.

Every President has killed. Even Carter. Obama has a lower kill count than any modern President besides Carter.