this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
786 points (98.5% liked)

/0

1685 readers
603 users here now

Meta community. Discuss about this lemmy instance or lemmy in general.

Service Uptime view

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ahoy mateys!

We are closing the voting on this topic a couple of days early as the result is already conclusive., Our threshold for passing the motion was for 2/3 of voting members in favor. We have far exceeded that threshold (see below) and have a good number of overall responses, so the proposed policy change has now been approved and takes effect immediately.

Our new policy on Xitter links

  1. No Xitter links are to be posted on this instance from the date of this announcement.
  2. Workarounds such as link shorteners and alternative front-ends that resolve to Xitter posts are also banned.
  3. Screenshots will still be permitted as per the overwhelming number of comments in support of this option.
  4. Exception: In rare cases there may be a need to verify the veracity of a Xitter post. If this need arises, then you may post a https://xcancel.com/ or https://archive.is/ version of the link. Please note this option should only be used sparingly and exclusively for fact-checking purposes.

We will begin communicating this instance policy change to all our users today.

Please try to be helpful to anyone who accidentally posts a Xitter link who may not yet be aware of the policy change, and/or feel free to report in the usual way.

N.B.: For the loopholers - by "Xitter links" we mean any links to content hosted on X (formerly Twitter). Alternative Xitter front-ends are also banned under this policy, unless exception #4 applies. Edit: The ban also applies to other Xitter-owned domains such as their photo blobstore (pbs) domain at pbd.twimg.com

Thanks to everyone involved for participating in the vote!


**The final tally is as follows: **

  • For: Salty Dog: An icon of two crossed cutlasses with a skull in the center in orange-red, black and white colors (2), Vouched: a minimalist compass icon. Orangered color (7), Deck Hand: An icon of anchor crossed with two staves in orange-red, black and white colors (5), First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color (3), Powder Monkey: An icon of powder barrel in orange-red, black and white colors (2), Threadiverse Enjoyer: An icon of a doubloon with a black hole in the center in orange-red, black and white colors (1)
  • Against:
  • Local Community: +2.6
  • Outsider sentiment: Very Positive
  • Total: +22.6
  • Percentage: 100.00%

To break this down a little differently:

  • Home instance users voted 93% in favor of the proposal (284/307)
  • External instance users voted 97% in favor of the proposal (70/72 note: these are not counted, but good to know)
  • Donating and vouched for users voted 100% in favor of the proposal (20/20 votes).
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So alternative front ends include something like nitter?

What about posting archive links of tweets like archive.is link for a tweet?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

I think either https://xcancel.com/ or https://archive.is/ is fine, but only where necessary as detailed in the original post.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

now this is how you do a rule change!

  • community poll
  • exception for the huge perceived benefit of allowing screenshots
  • workarounds and tools for when needed
  • overall very well written and communicated

others (ahem) should follow the example you provided here!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Home instance users voted 93% in favor of the proposal (284/307)

Donating and vouched for users voted 100% in favor of the proposal (20/20 votes).

At least we know in this poll it is 3.07 instance users votes (1/100 non-supporting, non-vouched and non-mvp users, cannot exceed +/- 10) vs 20 donated/vouched users votes. This is definitely a fair way to poll.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I've asked this question before because I feel it's best to clarify: does this also include URLs to content hosted on related but separate services, like the image hosting CDN at pbs.twimg.com?

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks for the question. The ban also applies to other Xitter-owned domains such as their photo blobstore (pbs) domain.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

Awesome, thanks.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I've never seen such a one-sided poll. I'm very impressed.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

It reaffirms my decision both to migrate here for my home instance and to start donating when I did.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

anarchy brother. we self select pretty hard.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is the best place to be.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago

About time. Good riddance. I hope other instances follow suit. Xitter is a damn plague.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

Get 'em King.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

Let's fucking go

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

As an external instance user, I would have supported this. Notable tweets can be reported on without giving any clicks to Xitter.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Out of curiosity, what was the sentiment for those who voted against? Or did they not comment?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'm against because I think it's just censorship. Funny how when it was twitter, no one had problems. But Musk bought it and now it's a problem.

My experience is that there is no fucking difference between how it was and how it is now. Lemmy just hates Musk.

Having said that, I'm not really passionate about it either way. And as long as screen shots can still be shown, I'm cool.

But guys, you're not even making a dent in Musk's money hoard by avoiding linking to it. lmao

And hey, it's this instance. And it was voted on, so I can totally accept it. I'd much rather it be a vote than some power-hungry guy just making the decision. :)

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think they could be summarized as:

  • Opposition to any form of censorship and/or concerns about "slippery slope" of banning Xitter links - i.e., what about Meta links?
  • It's important to be able to post newsworthy tweets in order to hold them to account and have a record.
  • Concerns about fact-checking - i.e., how can we check veracity of Twitter links if all we have is screenshots?
  • Some folks wanted to ban all Xitter links, including screen shots and xcancel links, for a complete blackout.

We've tried our best to address those concerns in the policy above, which is a bit of a compromise position that tries to take as many of these concerns into account as we reasonably could. But of course some are mutually exclusive positions, so it's not going to satisfy 100% of users.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Thanks for the summary. I think the rules you listed above capture all but the first.

I mean, the first is a whataboutism so I wouldn't even consider it. I would have said, "Fine... we'll discuss meta next but we're discussing Twitter NOW. If you are objecting because we aren't including Meta, then you're not debating in good faith."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The only people I saw saying no seemed to be saying it because "you should always link to the source so people can find it", which was rightfully called out for being incredibly silly given we're talking about tweets here

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

So I'm going to put on my "devil's advocate" hat on for a sec, because there is a nuance here that's worth addressing.

I absolutely hate how politicians and governments use a third party, commercial social media platform to discuss and even announce policies. But it's where we are. So if shit for brains Madam President Trump makes some sort of shitty announcement on Twitter, I would agree a source is needed and, I would go so far as to say an actual twitter URL source, only because a third, third party (even xcancel.com as currently allowed) could manipulate or even change a tweet. I'm not saying they would, but having the direct unimpeachable source would be necessary.

Given the fact that tweets can't be viewed without an account, xcancel is a good compromise that can then be drilled down to its original source if needed.

Now, putting my devil's advocate hat off, it's a silly argument to vote against. I presume that the rules would allow you to post the URL in a comment or a post body, and only prohibits using a twitter URL as the source.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seems like a great call!

Hey, there are only 20 paying users anyway, right? So were no vouchers used this time? And does a person vouching apply per vote or to the person (like is it a proxy vote or a renewable vote coupon?)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We had a total of 7 "vouched" for users (you can see this by hovering over the icons). Once a user has been vouched for, then they can participate in all votes unless that privilege is subsequently withdrawn.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Thanks for the clarification!

(I'll have to check the icons on my computer. I mainly use voyager on android and inline custom emoji support needs some work still.)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good riddance! (and any other relatable Green Day songs)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

American Idiot comes to mind.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Those graphics are sick! :D

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So archive links count as “alternative frontends”?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think our preference would be to stick to xcancel.com links if you need to link for factchecking. I hadn't given much consideration to archive links though, to be honest. I'd be interested to know your thoughts on those, and I'll review the comments again on that topic. We can always tweak the policy if need be.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

For clarification, is there a reason you would prefer xcancel links in particular over other frontends? I'm entirely uninformed on the matter, outside of seeing this service used relatively often and recently, compared to other Nitter instances.

I'm not the person you asked, but in my opinion, archiving services are more reliable than simple frontends, since they will continue to work even if the tweet in question is from an account that deletes or protects the tweets later, or if the account is suspended by Twitter. Considering the tumultuous relationship Twitter has with both reality and its users, this might be worth consideration too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Can you help recommend a reliable archiving service? We may be able to include an archive site as well for the same purpose. Xcancel was recommended by a lot of folks, so that's the main reason we picked that front end.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The best service I'm aware of is archive.is, which has been around for at least a decade, and does a good job taking snapshots of pages the way they've rendered. Beggars can't be choosers, though, and the alternatives are sparse. (Their site does recommend a couple others, though.)

Typically I would prefer The Web Archive, but currently their site is experiencing issues with Twitter URLs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Either https://xcancel.com/ or https://archive.is/ is fine then, but only where necessary as detailed in the original post.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think picking one domain for fact checking purposes is the best option just for clarity purposes. I could see using archival links as a general 'banned domains' approach worth considering in the future.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

+1 to this

I think that if we allow xcancel links for fact checking, archive links (and other nitter instances) should be allowed in that context as well, both for posterity (if tweet gets deleted) and since - from my experience - alternative front ends often come and go like the tide

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Threativore report filter has been setup for post url/body and comments. This filter will only apply to local communities. After a brief period of validating, we'll switch it to autoremove (which will provide a built-in appeal option)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Congratulations

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It would be nice if Lemmy had a plugin or something like that to change xitter links to xcancel.

It would be nicer if everything had that plugin.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

On the server instance level, or the user application level?

On the server instance level, I can see if being an issue if it extends to other redirects, and lead to malicious abuse by the instance.

On the user application level, would be valuable. I use Lemmy Sync and it'll be a nice feature to suggest.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Oh noooo...oh right, already had them blacklisted.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: next ›