this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
474 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19916 readers
3701 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OutlierBlue 130 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The amount of soft power in the world the US has lost since the beginning of Trump's first term is immeasurable.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

China is celebrating Trump's victory. Russia is seeing a return on their investments in Trump and Musk

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

Russian coverage is pretty fun as state-allowed news try to both ingrain the hatred of the West and celebrate this pack of leeches going full MAGA, sometimes in neighboring news pieces. And no, they don't explicitly say they destroy the US and that's the reason they cheer, they are just fanboying for them and their populism. Reading a couple of threads on local social media didn't make me piece together how this even works.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Good. America is the aggressor internationally. Losing soft power is a net benefit for mankind.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If they lose soft power, what do they have to fall back on?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BenVimes 79 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It doesn't matter if you guys somehow manage to get adults back in charge in the next 2-4 years. There is nothing stopping another Trump-esque person from being elected again soon after and tearing everything down again. Until you guys purge MAGA and can prove you are in no danger of a relapse, we simply can't trust you.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's not just the US. The far right is gaining momentum in Europe too, and the same will sooner or later repeat there (and I'm guessing sooner). Only a civil war in both the US and Europe will fix this now. Anyone passing the blame and not being prepared to fight themselves is part of the problem.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We've always had these shitheads. I'm sure every country has some percentage of them. Something in the range of 15-20% of the populace, at least, will always go for something vaguely donvict-shaped. These are the deplorables that Hillary was talking about. There is a lot of mental illness combined with terrible values instilled in them as well as a very poor education and zero ability for critical thinking - and that spells trouble. I bet most Americans could not spot and name a logical fallacy if their lives depended on it.

You'd think when someone like Nixon resigned that he would have had 0% support. That was not the case. And before that, you had the Birchers....I'm sure donvict and others like to credit donvict with inventing "maga", but he just walked in and slapped his name on this stuff - just like the rest of his "career", he didn't build anything. Whether it was the John Birch Society, or the teabaggers, or "maga", it's all the same bunch of horrible people acting in bad faith.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Until fairly recently, there was an opposition party instead of a controlled opposition party.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 92 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The US is now the single greatest threat to Western societies.

Current US allies need to be forging stronger alliances outside of the US sphere of influence, begin removing US bases, and withdraw from intelligence sharing agreements such as Five Eyes.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (4 children)

With his reelection after all that happened, I didn't see how anyone could argue we aren't the bad guys. We've shat all over our own principles, and we aren't supposed to threaten our allies or citizens.

The "he's just joking" or "you're listening to him wrong" has never been an excuse. The president is not there to "joke." They have a responsibility to the American people. Not some, not even the majority, but all of us equally. It may have never done that, but it was supposed to be the goal.

They are dismantling all the things there for our protection with no replacement. They are threatening our allies for selfish reasons. It is clear who will benefit, and it is only the powerful and hateful. They would burn everything down for a dollar and feel no regret.

[–] Revan343 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The president is not there to "joke."

I wouldn't even mind if the President was a funny guy.

Donald Trump is not a funny guy. I don't think he even knows what a joke is

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

No, I agree with you. I put joke in quotes because his jokes are bully jokes like "maybe I'll have to run for a third term" where it's antagonist at best or a thinly veiled threat.

If the president wants to be a normal person now and then and add some humor, or especially some humility, that is a good thing. I feel it's important that a president is treated as an at least somewhat common man and not a ruler.

I don't think I'd enjoy the company of people that find Trump's humor to be funny.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do not disagree at all. It's already happening anyway with all this Greenland/Canada nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They recently caught Trudeau on a hot mic confirming this is a precious metal play and he knows it. Same with Greenland.

Trump knows who those NJ drones belonged to, and he's making moves for an aggressive China with no access to raw materials for electronics.

[–] masterofn001 9 points 2 days ago

The drones were recently revealed to be authorized by the faa for "research". They knew what they were at the time, yet didn't say anything. I'm of the mind that the research was to psyop a.population to see how it would react.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The US has always been a piece of shit, and since WW2 has been the single biggest threat actor in the world. For a time, we managed to maintain a strong economy and generally cohesive body politic at home, but those have been steadily eroding. Any of the "good times" you can remember were at best, squandered opportunities to effect real changes that may have prevented the situation we are no waking up to.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Don't forget this either:

We weren't some benevolent force for good in WW2. People love pointing it out as if we proactively fought for good.

The Axis thankfully committed the greatest strategic blunder of the 20th century hands down and sunk our Naval fleet. They brought the fight to us. The US was quite fond of eugenics and practiced it in asylum before and after WW2.

We fought back. That isn't being a hero, that isn't coming to save the day. That's self-preservation.

The closest we've ever been to the good guys was at our founding, and even that was complicated.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is far far worse than this. Wealthy people in the US bankrolled the Nazi party. We created the problem. When the Nazi approached the nations of the world to take in the Jews before the final solution these same people lobbied to make sure no one would take them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

The German aristocracy bankrolled Hitler as well. It sorta sounded like you were implying that didn't happen.

Hitler disbanded the trade unions at the behest of heads of industries. Industry showed its gratitude with the 'Adolph Hitler Fund', to which the companies paid a % of turnover.

From 1933 onward 100 million reichsmarks were paid to Hitler every year, which would have made him a billionaire by today's standards.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Sure they did, the issue is they didn't have the money to make it happen. It would be very interesting to see who gave the most money to the Nazis. I am guessing US citizens were the largest contributor, but without any actual data it is just an educated guess.

This only goes to highlight how wealth inequality has created the environment for some of the worst atoricities. Why is it the wealthy seem to help start, fund, and benefit from all our modern wars.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

To be fair: The US did join the European theater despite having their hands full across the Pacific.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Yeah the US joined late. I'm just saying that since then, the US hasn't even done anything accidentally good.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (8 children)

The strong economy is a result of theft. The US has always been a piece of shit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

theft and technology, i would say.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

I guess, if you call smallpox and pistols and slavery technology

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] pedz 62 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Apparently I need to invest in democracy to read more.

But yeah. When I was a young adult I thought the U.S. couldn't do worse than W. Bush. Then the first Trump presidency, then another.

It's becoming pretty clear that the U.S. is not reliable and could turn on its supposed allies at any moment.

We're gonna have to put as much distance between the U.S., and us, as possible. Apparently that's what some U.S. voters want amyway.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 days ago (1 children)

French-US relations are easy to understand when you realize that at the outset of WWII we offered to lend them a garden hose as their house burned down (literally that was the rhetoric). not only was it the least we could do, it was less than helpful. this after they fought with intense vigor in WWI. after their defeat thanks to a lack of support from the english speaking world, the French people still refused to be defeated, fighting with all manner of weird bullshit guns that sucked. then, after WWII was over, making fun of the French for losing became part of the national American identity even though we couldn't even decide which side we were on at the start of the war.

France, rightfully, has never fully trusted us because of that shit. we even clowned on them in 2003 for not joining our idiot war in Iraq. these are ALL decisions France is surely feeling pretty good about. and do you know who they're getting more and more aligned with? the Polish. do you know who also gets clowned on for losing early in WWII despite fighting with everything they had for longer than anyone anticipated and only lost because no one came to their aid? Poland. and the way we make fun of France and Poland comes straight from nazi propaganda. and they a also refused to simply be occupied. they put up stiff resistance efforts that possibly shifted the outcomes of the war by forcing Germany to devote resources they didn't have to fighting a bunch of already defeated people.

meanwhile, what the fuck does America know? what the fuck does america do? do americans fight for their rights? not really. we hear something bad happens and at large go "something really must be done"

we are the worst friends to have, and France fucking knows it and treats us as such. sure they'll buy our weapons when we're allies, but they march to the beat of their own drum because they fucking see us. they know us. we have done nothing in the last 80 years to earn their trust. and right now they get to go to the other NATO allies and go "see?"

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Welp I'm glad I'm Canadian. We have a pretty solid history with the French.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

France: "see?"

Canada: "you need us to burn down DC again?"

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

*former allies

[–] BedSharkPal 49 points 2 days ago (5 children)

China must be fucking loving this. If it turns out Elon is an agent for them it would in no way surprise me.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago

He's outwardly good buddy with Putin. I don't think China is actually doing much to crack the u.s. from the inside, they're just excelling domestically and being loud about it while Russia does the heavily lifting.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We'll forgive them, eventually, once they return to sanity. But we'll never trust them again. It took more than fifty years for Germany to be fully accepted as a normal country again. It'll take at least as long for the US.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago

Idk one Trump term could be considered an anomaly, a stress test to our systems to see if we could fix them to be stronger. We didn't. Now we're on round 2 and speed running alienating our allies.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We often joked about unstable "banana republics" with US Americans, but it's starting to become real awkward 😅

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›