this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
21 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

37136 readers
1602 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’m a bit confused, mainly because I’ve never been told this before. I once was trying to talk to someone I met, and asked them questions about themselves to get to know them.

After a while, they just said, “You don’t have to do this, you know. I’m fine with being silent.”

How would you respond to this? I don’t really know the implications or anything.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It means that the person you are talking to believes that you're just making polite conversation because you're uncomfortable with silence. They are letting you know that they would prefer you didn't make conversation, because they prefer silence to idle chatter.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago
[–] BlameThePeacock 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The implication is that they're not into small talk.

You can choose to continue the small talk and they will probably continue responding, but they are letting you know that they're not really into it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Perhaps they assumed that you felt obligated to speak to them, and they felt the need to absolve you of that obligation. That would be the literal meaning of the phrase.

A different interpretation could be that they didn't want to continue the conversation. In this scenario, they would prefer to be silent, and by suggesting that, "You don't have to do this," they have given you a polite, symbolic agency in ending the conversation, implying that both of you would rather be silent. In this way, instead of directly rejecting you, the decision to be silent would be shared. It's a way of allowing you to save face.

Note that just because they might want to be silent, doesn't mean that they dislike you. There are many reasons why people might know to speak at any given moment, and some people are just shy.

It's hard to say which interpretation is correct without hearing the tone of voice, and understanding the general situation. There could be other factors or other interpretations as well.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I think their tone was kind of matter-of-fact

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, it looks like they were more into being quiet and non interactive.

Generally, I would have said it differently because I'm an old fart and not afraid to say "hey, could you chill on the questions, I'm not up for it." Not only am I fine with being direct, I also don't feel the need to be snarky.

So obviously, I'm also not likely to ever have to respond to such a statement as theirs.

So, what I think would be the ideal response is different from how I would actually respond.

In your place, I think something along the lines of "cool, no problem" would have been best. It lets them know you got the message, but doesn't push back on a stranger for being a bit of a dick, which can be risky.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Okay, thank you! We said a bit more later and they asked me “Is there anything you’ve never told anyone because people would laugh at you?” That one thing they said just kinda confused me

[–] adespoton 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They were opening up about themselves, not implying something about you.

People who actually listen are rare.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Thank you! I meant implying something in general

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It really depends on tone and how long the interaction would last. I'd consider saying that rude most of the time as the person making small talk is just doing something nice.

I'm not exactly sure how to respond to that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

I'd say the correct way to respond is by not saying anything. They've clearly indicated that they aren't interested in continuing the conversation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I’d consider saying that rude most of the time as the person making small talk is just doing something nice.

the question here is how many hints/suggestions/requests has OP already blown past? if all they talk about is the weather, chances are you should just let the conversation drop.

it could be cultural, but yeah, I feel like the person was quite exasperated with OP and was all-but-point-blank telling them to stop talking.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I just remained in silence, then asked them some questions like “So… how’s life?”

Them: “It’s ok, I have a part-time job and usually just stay at home.”

(Silence)

“What kind of things do you do at home?”

“watch tv. I like movies and whatever Adult Swim show comes on.”

Then after a while of silence, they told me I didn’t have to do this.

[–] adespoton 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah; they got the read that you were feeling awkward with silence, but they didn’t want to be asked questions about their life.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago