this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
344 points (99.1% liked)

politics

20014 readers
4516 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

3 weeks late

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

Some one should call and tell them about elon musk.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

They should really use SecureDrop

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

I'd trust the Democrats to protect a whistleblower like smoking would protect me from cancer

[–] [email protected] 17 points 17 hours ago

Democrats should be rallying for an american revolution right now, but they don't have the spine to do that.

[–] [email protected] 102 points 1 day ago

"Here's this whistleblower website so you can report all these illegal and unauthorized activity so we can bitch about you expecting us to be the opposition party and then do nothing about it."

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago

And since the Democrats aren't in power, there's fuck all they can do with the complaints.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To who? Y'all haven't done shit and are letting it all happen.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Honest question here. What are they supposed to do that they aren't doing? They are in the minority in the House and Senate and have limited options besides bitching about what's going on and trying to draw attention to the criminality.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago

For one, not voting to confirm the most awful, dangerous, unqualified cabinet nominees this nation has ever seen. That would have been a good start.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Blocking nominations, slowing down general procedures, grandstanding about every fucked up stupid thing that Republicans are doing, Lock up the Senate and the house with debate and bullshit, introduce bills that would do the things that people actually want even if they're not going to get voted on, wherever possible don't cooperate, stop confirming his appointments, etc.

The Democrats should not be letting Republicans get anything done. Republicans always manage to rule from the minority by just being obstinate little shits. The Democrats should at least try that.

Donald Trump must be stopped and since that's not possible the least they should be doing is slowing his roll.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

They can't block nominations or stop the confirmations of his appointments. They are in the minority and the filibuster rule does not apply to this. They would need at least a few republicans to vote with them in order to block anyone. They couldn't even get enough to block RFK and he is absurdly unqualified for his position.

They have also been slowing down procedures.

Hours after Mr. Trump was sworn in, Democrats agreed to the speedy 99-0 confirmation of Marco Rubio, their Senate colleague, to be secretary of state. But they have since shown that they are willing to use procedural tactics to slow other nominees even if they are destined for confirmation, including forcing time-consuming floor votes on action that is usually done by mutual agreement.

They have also been grandstanding and making noise about stuff. For example, Rep. Garcia brought a "dick pick" - a pick of Musk -to the committee headed by Greene to highlight her bringing a poster of Hunter Biden's dick to the House last year.

The Democrats should not be letting Republicans get anything done. Republicans always manage to rule from the minority by just being obstinate little shits. The Democrats should at least try that.

As I said, they cannot stop the Republicans from getting anything done. They cannot use the filibuster on confirmations. They have 48 votes. Three Republicans have to cross over to block anyone. So far, Mitch McConnell is the only one to vote with them against RFK and that's because RFK is anti-vax and Mitch had fucking Polio. They can use the filibuster when the Republicans try to pass regular bills, unless the Republicans decide to drop the filibuster rule altogether, which they may end up doing. We'll have to wait and see.

In the House, the Democrats have already said that they are ready to let the government shut down on March 14th rather than support Trump's budget plans. This is following the Republican playbook and I hope they do it. The only thing that is going to make a difference is if we get millions of people in the street fighting Trump's agenda and maybe a government shut down will do that.

There's only so much the Dems can do though when the voters handed the reins of the House, Senate and White House to Trump and the GOP.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

Democrat from New Jersey, Andy Kim, voted to confirm Kristi Noem. Do not really care that his vote would not have changed the outcome, that is completely unacceptable.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

Even in a minority position, elected officeholders have a bully pulpit, and any US Congresscritter or Senator is among the most politically powerful people in America. Any one of them could call up a local TV station, ask for an interview, and they’d gladly put them on the air, and could actually say something people need to hear. They could come to a rally, post a video to YouTube. Any one of them could walk into one of the Musk-captured bureaucracies and refuse to leave until they're arrested. Anything like that would get people’s attention, and might matter in some small but genuine degree.

That would be leadership. That would be resistance. That would be something. What Dems are doing is damned close to nothing.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Optimistically, they're supposed to be organizing people onto the streets by calling out Trump's bullshit. I can't disagree that their actions have been underwhelming as a group so far (good on Bernie and AoC though) but I think this is a good move.

The Trump administration is clearly willing to silence whistle-blowers so we need something outside the GOP's reach to document these issues.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

They are at least signaling some sort of action now, so as you said I think it's a good move as well.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago

At least pretending like they care would be a good start. They unanimously approved a few Trump appointees on the promise that the republicans might reconsider one or two and whoops the dems once again got the football pulled out from in front of them. They literally cannot learn the lesson that bargaining with the republicans gets them nothing in return ever because they are the only ones who will hold up their end of the deal…

At a bare minimum they can stop doing that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Not throwing the election by abandoning the working class would've been a good start.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Respect the law to the same extent that the opposition does. Direct Action included.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

There's no answer. People wanna bitch all day is all. Perhaps if a shit ton of people didn't decide it didn't matter in November the Democrats could have actual power to do something.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 day ago

That's the new "get your name on a list" website. If I'm going to be a whistleblower, the last person I'm going to is a politician.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago

I wouldn’t trust this for a minute. They’ll subpoena the records and retaliate against them and there’s nothing anyone will do about it beyond complaining about petty things like it being unconstitutional

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

why does the expanded hamburger icon say "about chuck"? is this chuckie's website or something?

consider me out of the loop and eli5 on these matters.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Chuck Schumer is the Senate Minority Leader, so he's the head of the democratic senators.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

thank you, that explains the attribution perfectly!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Blow the whistle (toot toot toot toot)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

I was actually thinking this, but hey, whatever gets some action going! https://youtube.com/watch?v=CBJtzEKetBM&t=67s

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Probably so they have people to turn in to save their own asses. They are just as bent as Trump but they have "decorum".