this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
564 points (98.6% liked)

politics

20329 readers
4904 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump signed an executive order expanding presidential control over independent agencies, including the FTC, FCC, and SEC.

The order enforces the “unitary executive theory,” which argues the president has sole authority over the executive branch. It grants Trump’s budget chief, Russell Vought, oversight of these agencies’ performance and budgets.

The move is expected to face legal challenges, as past presidents have largely respected agency independence.

Trump defended the order, stating, “He who saves his Country does not violate any Law.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 190 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Trump defended the order, stating, “He who saves his Country does not violate any Law.”

Wow, that really sums up the fascist intent right there. The ends justify the means and no law applies to him.

I wish the general public were paying more attention.

[–] [email protected] 95 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Journalists really need to provide the context that he's quoting Napoleon, another dictator.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 days ago

The quote sounds better in the original French.

Amusingly, the solution for dictators also sounds better in the original French.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago

The general public who pays attention sees this and feels absolutely powerless because the opposition party refused to be the opposition.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm rewatching handmaid's tale in absolute despair and I'm not even american. You people need to fight, not only for yourselves and your country but for the rest of us who are living in America's shadow. You set yourself up as the land of the free - you can't fall. There's too much riding on you. We'll all follow, if America goes. If Hitler was American...

And when you get rid of these assholes, don't allow the same shitty systemic injustices. You need to institute a libertarian socialist society and start being a true leader for the rest of the world, no more robbing poor countries.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (5 children)

See, the thing is, America's been propped up by toothpicks and Santa Claus-esque belief for most of our lifetimes. There were clearly no guardrails, no real systems in place, and no people with the willpower or actual dedication to the country to hold it against any level of dedicated attack. Hell, many of its people are so broken and systematically idiotic that they welcomed the attack as long as the got to guffaw and clap like seals at the people brought down to their god awful level.

It had to fall. It likely won't rise again in any healthy, phoenix sort of way, but if it manages to do so, maybe it won't only have the untested veneer of strength. But for now, it's a corpse. Europe needs to save itself and not add their bodies to the cemetery, because what took down America is actively coming for the world.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

Do you think the realities of global heating have caused a kind of mass delusion?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 104 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

America, when are you going to stop this? You finally have a chance to exercise the second amendment, to defend your freedom and to show the world you aren't the bad guys; And you do nothing...

Trump/Musk are literally following the steps laid out by Hitler and they aren't even hiding it.

[–] [email protected] 113 points 2 days ago (17 children)

I see this sentiment a lot. "Why aren't Americans doing anything? Why aren't leftist militias rising up to take back the capital? Etc. Etc. Etc."

First of all, asking "why aren't Americans doing anything" is a highly unaware question. We are doing things, but they aren't going to give any airtime to the protests, marches, boycotts, and legal efforts taking place, because the media is now firmly on the side of those with power, not the common people.

Second of all, it's pretty heartless of you to just casually ask us to "exercise the second amendment", because when you ask that, you're asking for at least some of us to die. Put yourselves in our shoes, and be honest - if you were in our position, would it be so easy and casual to just pick up a gun and join a violent revolution? Would you be willing to risk death in that situation? Personally, I'm not a soldier, I've never had an interest in guns, I'd be less than useless in that capacity. So I'm looking at other things we can do before escalating to that.

I get that everyone's scared because the nation with the most powerful military on earth is falling into fascism. That's terrifying to most Americans as well, and I think a lot of us are still frozen with that fear. I understand and agree that this problem is on Americans to fix. But I hope the rest of the world will be willing to help when we call on them, instead of just sitting idly by wondering when that magical second amendment is gonna kick in.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah the people making 2A arguments are seemingly asking people to murder people on their behalf with zero regards to how that plays out. Not surprisingly most gun owners are in fact not looking to murder people.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Also, even if they were, who do they have access to murder? It's almost begging people to take their frustrations out on their neighbors, which will only make things so much worse.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago

I think the second amendment is pointed out so readily, because most of the world has watched America and their guns and ridiculous gun problems, and that is usually what is pointed at in some kind of gotcha defence. Second, we do see the protests and legal efforts, and honestly looking in, seems like that's pissing into the wind.

As for myself committing violence in an situation similar to America's? Can't honestly answer one way or the other until I am in the situation myself, but don't think it would be a hard no, I'm not opposed to violence in the correct situation, and boy you guys are, if not there already, very very close to that correct situation.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

There's also the fact that people with consumer grade weapons aren't going to be doing shit against the military, which is what would be brought out against them. If I knew there was even a good chance that I could do something leading to my death that would do a damn bit of good, I'd do it. But there isn't.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

There were multiple assassination attempts.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 days ago (9 children)

America, when are you going to stop this? You finally have a chance to exercise the second amendment, to defend your freedom and to show the world you aren’t the bad guys; And you do nothing…

Most of the people who are so in favor of the 2nd amendment are actively supporting this.

And people ask why we aren't doing anything about it as if people can just pick up a gun willy nilly and go join a violent revolution as easily as joining your local church group. What are people supposed to do? Walk up to the Capitol with an AK-47 and start firing while shouting "DOWN WITH TRUMP?". That's a great way to end up dead, in a psych ward, or in ADX-Florence. Trying to organize armed resistance of any size that matters in an era where everybody is carrying around a tracking device in their pockets is a great way to have the whole group rounded up and sent to Gitmo on treason charges.

This isn't the movies.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago (6 children)

On top of this. It isn't just Dump. It's the entire GOP. Plus the douche crew and his nazi youth that have been ransacking shit that they don't understand. Yeah, going in armedmay get you 1 person. It won't do any good. You're cutting a small scale off of a large shit snake.

The best we can do is arm ourselves (and I fucking hate that I have to resort to this option) and prep for when shit goes south. I suspect that will be mid terms. We'll see armed yokels "guarding" vote drop off locations and polling locations. If there is any sign of a dem win anywhere, all hell will break loose with diaperdon claiming fraud. He'll probably pull some shit like his attempted coup and we'll see the polling station yokels going nuts.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

If Congress wasn't filled with feckless lickspittles, they could just not fund the executive branch. But they are, so they will

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If Congress wasn’t filled with feckless lickspittles

If that was the case, trump would've already been convicted of impeachment and been disqualified.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I hate they way he coops that quote that was meant for luigi.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Legal challenges? They are ignoring the courts. How will that change anything?

When do we start exercising our second amendment on this tyrannical dictator?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This has been the first time in my life I've actually considered buying a gun.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Do it! Exercise that right before they try and take that away too. Go to a gun show, super cheap! Talk to the guys there about personal defense, they will give you such good advice. Head to a shooting range and fire off a few to get a good idea on how they handle. What’s the worst that can happen? They sit around and collect dust because you don’t need to overthrow a tyrannical dictator?

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't even have the words to express my feelings properly to this bullshit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (9 children)

What is the legal argument against this? The article was paywalled, but the summay only says that past presidents have respected agency independence. That sounds like just a gentlemans agreement. Nothing legally binding. So do the challenges have a leg to stand on?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Musk's and his actions are illegal, or were illegal mostly before the Supreme Court decided there's some sleezy presidential immunity. The problem is they are so firm and quick at changing the rules of the game that no institution can catch up and, most importantly, generally afraid they would be directly attacked by these fuckers. Some commenters preciously said that it's stupid that most of people who could've challenged or straight up dismissed his executive orders are pussies for resigning or being complicit, but, in their defence, all of their personal data was leaked by Muskrat and he and Trump have a pardoned terrorist cell to carbomb them or whatever. And it's snowballing from department to department, and every new one looks at those who already kneed to the maggot.

All these famous checks and balances were DDOSed and frightened into submission. i don't think they were exceptionally and inherently fragile. it's just the rightwing strategists just got the right guy, the right coverage and the right plan to make it all as easy as break-and-enter with absent homeowners.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

What was illegal about what musk did? Be specific. On paper he is "working" for the president, and my understanding is that the cabinet members in charge of the various agencies gave him the go ahead to do what he is doing. Both of those are directly or indirectly elected officials charged with running the executive branch of the government. My take is that congress has depended on gentleman's agreements rather than passing laws to ensure the agencies aren't tampered with like is happening now.

[–] ILikeBoobies 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are laws against it but the Supreme Court gave the president total immunity so all those laws are now void

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which laws. Cause I haven't seen any quoted anywhere. And, they only gave him immunity for official acts. Then said they (the courts) get to decide what an official act is. Lastly, they did not take away congress's ability to prosecute him in the form of impeachment.

[–] ILikeBoobies 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

Did you actually read that. A lot of "potentially", "possibly" and things like that. In short, it isn't all that clear cut.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] grte 36 points 2 days ago
[–] Glide 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trump defended the order, stating, “He who saves his Country does not violate any Law.”

Okay, Adolf.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Napoleon, actually. So, a different dictator, but still a dictator.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Good thing we spent the 4 years between trump terms with a young, motivated go-getter who checks notes his in a closet for four years and was less seen/heard than any other president.

Moderates are not equipped to fight fascism, we can't keep rotating between the two because the fascists will break more than a Neoliberal would ever want to fix.

Neither actually wants to fix shit, just keep their wealthy donors happy

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 days ago

Also, this time we have fascists with a plan at hand. They even say beforehand what they will do and no one bats an eye, until "wait, they were serious?"

They did their homework and are swiftly taking over.

Trump's abhorrent smug face of late tells everything we need to know if they are succeeding or not.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›