this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
330 points (98.8% liked)

politics

20474 readers
3473 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Republican lawmakers who have condemned Putin hesitate to criticize Trump’s recent pro-Russia stance.

Trump falsely blamed Ukraine for the war, called President Zelenskyy a “dictator,” and demanded Ukraine surrender rare earth minerals in exchange for U.S. aid.

While some GOP officials reaffirmed support for Ukraine, they avoided directly challenging Trump. Meanwhile, Trump’s administration negotiated a Russia-Ukraine peace deal without initially including Ukraine.

Zelenskyy rejected Trump’s minerals demand, warning of dangerous precedents.

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Blows my mind, having grown up in the age of Reagan Republicans, to see how Republicans act today, vs then. Its so weird.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago

I'm not shocked that they're proving themselves self-serving cowards after lying about being the party to uphold traditional values and be trusted to take care of america and the american people, to bring honour and glory on the world stage.
It was always a lie but just a less obvious lie than what's going on now and they never had any shame. Like corporations which only care about values or anything else insofar as it affects their bottom line.

They were always looking after their own interests - wealthy people protecting and trying to increase their own wealth.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

IMO.... Reagan republicans would have behaved like this if they could have gotten away with it.

They've been working on getting to this point for a very, very long time.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Reagan republicans would have behaved like this if they could have gotten away with it.

No. Hard-disagree with that. For the Republican party members in Congress at least. Those who voted for them, some not, some so.

The greatest generation types would not stand for how the country is currently being used, and they spilled blood on foreign sands to earn that right of judgement.

I gotta believe that Nixon has got to be doing cartwheels in his coffin right now (he might of actually been cremated/urned, but you know what I mean), seeing what Trump/MAGA gets away with, when he was just trying to ease-drop on some opponents and used the FBI to do so.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

you mean... such Republican Luminaries™️ like Mitch McConnell? who refused to even hold hearings on Obama's supreme court negotiations to SCOTUS? ensuring trump had more picks than necessary?

or Sen. Chuck Grassley, or Rep. Hal Rogers? both of whom bend the knee.

McConnell has done more to help trump get- and return- to office than any other person alive.

All three of them started their careers during the reagan era. You act like Trump just showed up and took over. he was a useful patsy to the republican agenda, but that's about it. Trump is able to do all of this without much (or any) pushback from republicans not because they're weak and powerless, but because, rather, this is exactly what they've been working for.

Edit: and lets not forget reagan's "agenda"... limited government, tax cuts, strong national defense, and traditional social values... sound familiar?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

No, he doesn't. He means the generation of Republicans even older than them, who fought in WWII and were senior congressmen during the Reagan administration.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

All of them served during Reagan. maybe not senior, but that's just moving goal posts. and as someone else mentioned, Roger Stone.

Republican's have been baking this cake for decades, and they don't get to pretend like it's all just Trump.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Something, something…Roger Stone

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

Having once been one (well I was under voting age at the time), it's so confusing to me. Fortunately I'm considerably older and wiser now, but it's wild to see. Russia had replaced Nazis as the predominant bad guy of the zeitgeist. Now both are seen favorably by the right.

I feel like the brain worm problem is far more prevalent than just RFK. Is this just a subtle alien invasion? I'm not actually given to such conspiratorial thinking but if it were true, it would explain a lot.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Poor education, religion and unchecked propaganda. American problems that have been ignored for decades.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

This isn't just American problems. Hell, the AfD just won 151 seats in Germany, last I checked. This insanity is a global problem.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

brain worm

Some are seriously thinking it is the prevalent lead in the water and the result of many years of lead exposure in gasoline.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

After dealing with acute lead poisoning of >300× in a US capitol, I believe it.

[–] jerkface 2 points 4 days ago

right wing ideologies are right wing ideologies. of course they are viewed favourably.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Having once been one (well I was under voting age at the time), it’s so confusing to me.

Well, if you take them at face value, then the things they said were important to them back in the Reagan era were just lies, since today's MAGA-Republicans don't follow anything like them now.

But even having said that, supporting a Russian dictator invading another country and NOT supporting NATO, that's such a un-Republican thing to do that its hard to believe they can even act that way.

Half-kidding, but I'm thinking that there are lots of photos of political people doing compromising things being held over their heads.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No I think you're right. I think based on some of the crazy stuff that has come out (that leak just as Hawthorne blowing up Republicans with his dumbfuckery), that there is a level you can't reach in the party unless they either have something on you to keep you under control, or you give them something to ensure loyalty.

Maybe it's conspiratorial but it's not crazy like the government is hiding lizard people or Hitler is hiding in a base on the far side of the moon.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

I think based on some of the crazy stuff that has come out (that leak just as Hawthorne blowing up Republicans with his dumbfuckery), that there is a level you can’t reach in the party unless they either have something on you to keep you under control, or you give them something to ensure loyalty.

Going down that rabbit hole for a second, if true, then how in the F does the FBI/CIA/Military handle that scenario, when the political branch of the goverment has been compromised?

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

'The Russians aren't communist anymore, see they are just oligarch capitalists, like we aspire to be'

-republicans

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

As somebody who was barely sentient when Clinton was in office and grew up under Bush Jr., I've seen the writing on the wall since I was old enough to understand the concept of sexuality.

I can't say I expected blatant Nazism and a fascist coup back then, but I remember when we had to make up a brand new word that meant "I'm a straight man who also happens to wash their hair and like dressing well" because that was enough to make people assume you were gay. And if people thought you were gay, it could cost you your career.

The slide started under Reagan but truly accelerated when Nixon showed the Republicans that big government could be good for them, too. My entire life, the two guiding principles of conservative philosophy have been hatred and control. American society has always had issues with deeply rooted bigotry.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 days ago (2 children)

"Zelensky is a ruthless dictator that started the war, but if he gives is rare minerals we will give him weapons"

I'm baffled Trump can make this kind of argument and nobody on his party A. Calls him out for saying Ukraine is a dictatorship that started the war B. Calls him out for gleefully announcing he will support a warring dictatorship for a price

Bunch of traitors.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago

Actually, no. It's worse than that.

Trump isn't asking for rare earth minerals in exchange for weapons. Trump is demanding the rare earth minerals as retroactive payment for weapons already received. If Zelensky signs over 50% of the mineral rights as payment for past aid, then maybe Trump would be willing to strike a deal for new weapons depending on what else Zelensky is willing to give up. Maybe.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They're on the same Putin Payrolll

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nah, he has dirt on them. The DNC emails weren't the only ones hacked, but they were the only ones released.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

I'm sure they all have dirt on each other down to mutually assured destruction. I'm still betting we're over 50% remotely controlled on both sides.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I was checking out that CNN news humor show “Have I Got News For You” and they had Mike Lawler on as one of the guests. It was painful to watch him stick to talking points on certain subjects (like Ukraine.) Even the GOP congress critters who are somewhat anti-trump act like they’re hostages, while the all-in people act like cult members.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's because the US has entered an Authorian Era. The penalty of going against an authoritarian ruler is literal career suicide so they have to toe the party line. Even if they're against it.

A Conversation With Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/podcasts/america-path-authoritarianism-democracy-trump

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

I had to shut it off. To everyone else's credit they hammered him about it, but I cannot keep watching something that platforms....that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Bunch of cuck bitch traitors.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Rotten to the very core serving the felon king.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Reagan would be rolling in his grave now. Given that he was one of the key players to pave the way for this, I'd laugh at the irony of it if, you know, it wasn't screwing the whole world over.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Back in the day, a Soviet leader said that when the time came to kill the West, they'd use weapons an American businessman sold them.

edit = did a search and apparently it's a spurious quote that can't be verified.

On the other hand, it sure looks accurate right now.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The capitalist will sell you the rope for his own noose or something?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Apparently, it's been attributed to everyone from Marx to Gorbachev and never been verified as an actual quote.

otoh, it's sure looking accurate right now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Kompromat.

Gaetz. Epstein. Drake.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Imagine believing that politicians stand for anything at all besides violently imposing their privilege. These bros couldn't give less of a fuck about ukraine or anybody.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I personallybelieve the US was always some sort of corporate authoritarianism. Democrats that spoke against the corporate status quo often got shoved aside.

But now more than ever we have entered a naked Authorian Era of single party rule. The penalty of going against an authoritarian ruler is literal career suicide so they have to toe the party line. Even if they’re against it.

And the opposition party? It doesn't exist, the democratic party was never an opposition party and they enabled a lot of what is happening now for reasons I just mentioned.

A Conversation With Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/podcasts/america-path-authoritarianism-democracy-trump