this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
80 points (98.8% liked)

World News

41540 readers
4005 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/39809384

A humanitarian organization that has been feeding more than 100,000 refugees from Myanmar in western Thailand says it only has enough funds left to provide food for one month as the U.S. government’s international aid freeze bites.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Reading about the predicted terrible human cost of the loss of aid across the world does make me wonder if this was a possible hidden motivation for its creation. Presented as altruism it nevertheless went some way to make countries and groups dependent upon it, thereby creating a tool for local destabilisation as needed. Trump is not using it in this way, his rationale is worse even than the one I have suggested.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Reading about the predicted terrible human cost of the loss of aid across the world does make me wonder if this was a possible hidden motivation for its creation.

Hanlon's razor - “never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.”

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

No, you have every right (and obligation, actually) to be disillusioned about the United States. This thought, however, verges on conspiratorial delusion.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

All in an effort to save less than a percent of the US budget. Musk could literally solve every problem in the US with his billions of dollars and still have more money than he could ever spend in one lifetime, yet we need to cut aid to other countries because it's "wasteful."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

"Musk could literally solve every problem in the US"

Musk and his billions couldn't fund Medicaid for a year. He'd make a sizable dent, but only a dent, in our overall student loan debt. Public debit, which is becoming a major issue with interest now consuming a huge part of our budget, would barely be dented.

He could fund US Aid for a few years. This in large part comes down to the fact that it's minuscule spending.

Musk could do very little with "every" problem in the USA. If he decided to, he could address some of the smaller specific issues but that's it. I'd applaud him for it but we need to be realistic about the numbers here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Let them eat cake - Love MAGA