this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
309 points (99.4% liked)

politics

20567 readers
5030 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

JD Vance's confrontational role in Friday's Oval Office clash with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy became a flashpoint for the US-European relationship.

Vance provoked Zelenskyy by accusing him of leading "propaganda tours," escalating tensions before Trump joined in.

Critics suggest this confrontation was deliberately orchestrated to damage US-Ukraine relations, noting immediate and synchronized Republican messaging afterward.

European officials backed Zelenskyy while expressing concern that the US is siding with Putin. Following the meeting, Trump officials indicated they might cut all military aid to Ukraine, marking a potential collapse of the transatlantic alliance.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

How did the party of this

Turn into this so quickly?

[–] wirebeads 74 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel very sorry for the everyday Americans involved in this maga project 2025 racist agenda.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't feel too sorry. About half of us asked for this clown horrer show.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Only 20% of us ASKED for this. Everyone else was outvoted or complicit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Silence is complicity, yes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not really the same as asking for it though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Fair enough

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hate this "emerged" language shit. They've been practically screaming what they were going to do at anyone who was willing to listen.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

yeah pretty much every headline could simply be:

Trump/Vance/MAGA Does Exactly What They Told Everyone They'd Do

and the subheader line could be: Traditional Democrats/Media shocked that Trump/Vance/Maga did least shocking thing ever.

[–] Showroom7561 45 points 1 day ago (3 children)

European officials backed Zelenskyy while expressing concern that the US is siding with Putin. Following the meeting, Trump officials indicated they might cut all military aid to Ukraine, marking a potential collapse of the transatlantic alliance.

I think it would do the global community a lot of good to simply cut the States off from any resources, all trade, and any aid they need from us (like helping put out their damn fires!).

If the rapist in chief thinks his country is the only country that matters, let them experience the next four years in a complete global blackout.

Maybe then this jackass will realize that the States needs the world more than the world needs the States.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

cut the States off from any resources, all trade, and any aid they need

This is 100% the reason that putin installed these fascists in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That doesn't really change the fact that the damage the US can do under a fascist dictatorships trade wars needs to be minimized. The solution isn't to continue enriching a hostile nation state.

The only chance America has at this point is national upheaval and likely civil war, otherwise the enemy within will remain and continue pulling the copper from the walls. You can't magically deprogram 70 million people from extremism and mental illness. The cancer has to be cut out.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

I'm just pointing out how effectively putin has engineered a situation that gives him the most room to continue his conquest of eastern europe

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

americans are still too content to even have a civil war, still have access to youtube, and all the social media.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not only that. We should stop honoring american IP (intellectual property). Just pirate all their shit. Disassemble their tanks, hack their cars and tractors. Remove all their software and replace it with open source, Europe backed programs.

Because this will hurt them globally. A crack for a car works in Mexico as it does in Denmark. An open source office suite also helps developing nations, that could then also get rid of MS.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Jailbreak all the Teslas.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

EU still needs resources from US though. Remember the Russian gas they were so dependent before 2022? It was largely replaced with American gas.

[–] adespoton 23 points 1 day ago

Replace it with Canadian gas that’s currently going to the US.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

See, this is why you don't elect rapist kids into public office. And you don't sit back and let others elect them into office either.

[–] Tm12 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Safe to assume this is Thiel then? Or the TechBroFuedalists?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Is that the Vance faction?

I'm genuinely asking:

Why does Thiel/techbros want closer ties with Russia and to seemingly break the postwar imperial status quo?

Is there any Republican faction that wants to maintain it? I'm guessing maybe old hands like McConnell?

This seems to be the first big Flashpoint for the neoliberals to actually stand up and push back, via corporate media.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They want kingdoms.

A return to "the good ol' days" of feudal lords, jus primae noctis, and plebs to work into early graves.

[–] masterofn001 5 points 1 day ago

They call them network states.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

When the Soviet Union collapsed, there was kinda a "fire sale" of government assets... They just got "sold" (effectively handed) to people who were favoured by the leaders of the time. This was how these Russian oligarchs came to be.

I think this is where the wind is blowing in the USA. Tear apart anything the government does and hand the responsibility for those things as private contracts, and to just hand those contracts to whomever seems like they'd be a good soldier.

Basically, rip all of the copper out of the walls, sell it at 10% market rate to the PayPal mafia, and then let them sell you copper-as-a-service.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think its already too late for them to push back... They got lured in by market deregulation and if they revolt now, they see their capital in danger (seized, redistributed by force of policy, etc.).

Fascism and neoliberalism can also get along quite well.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's simple really - Vance was the point man because Trump wants to be able to throw somebody under the bus if need be.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

This checks out. And explains why President musk wasn’t there for this meeting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

That dumbass could break a iron man with a rubber hammer.