this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
1435 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

67422 readers
4110 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

still figuring out car bombs....

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

"good terrorism" should be the next word of the year

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 272 points 1 week ago (6 children)

In posts on X following the incident, Tesla CEO Elon Musk called the incidents β€œterrorism” and said the company β€œjust makes electric cars and has done nothing to deserve these evil attacks.”

OK buddy.

[–] [email protected] 118 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The cars suck, but he's right that the company hasn't done anything to deserve this. He's the one who chose to make himself the face of Tesla, though, so however people feel about him, they'll feel about any business he owns.

Terrorism, though? Hardly. It's protest. He's the one doing terrorism by dismantling the government.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago

The cars are poorly designed to the point of being dangerous. They deserve it a little.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (38 children)

Terrorism, though? Hardly.

Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature

Pretty much the definition of terrorism. Doesn't necessarily make it wrong.

That's what was so terrifying about the Patriot Act for so long.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 week ago (32 children)

Violent, criminal acts

Property damage is not violence and nonviolent protests are not terrorism. They will claim it is. They are lying.

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

Yes, but that definition also defines... basically all the most heinous things that Trump and those around him have done in the last... 5 years, lets say? ... as terrorism.

Remember CPAC, 2022?

... kinda speaks for itself.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (6 children)

The board needs to remove Elon today.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yep. I don't get why they haven't. He's tanking their shit badly.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (10 children)

They just paid fucking 60 billion dollars to him to keep him from quitting. Maybe a smidge of sunk cost fallacy.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 112 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

We know that Teslas sometimes just catch fire on their own.

We also know that sometimes Tesla drivers will set their cars on fire themselves on purpose. Because of that...

We also know that Elon has a backdoor into all Teslas.

Now ask yourself which is more likely, the woke liberal crybabies actually causing violence or a drug addled and politically embattled CEO of a company that lost 50% of its value in the past 3 months creating a false flag to villainize the left and get insurance to cover damage to the vehicles he can't sell?

/s (kind of)

[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Didnt the Nazi party burn down the Reichstag and blame it on the other party?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

Given Elons history, it's definitely possible.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 week ago (7 children)

if you know anything about who did it no you don't

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 86 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Insurance fraud due to slow sales

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 week ago

Oh no. Anyway..

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 week ago

I have never, and will never, see anyone vandalize a Tesla. πŸ™ˆ

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago

I didn't see nuffin

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I have zero evidence Musk ordered the Tesla vandalism. Which, coincidentally, is exactly how surprised I'd be to find out he had.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Man, if I had the poor luck/foresight to have purchased a Tesla earlier, I would be driving like the politest mofo in existence these days.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd set it on fire and make an insurance claim.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

Can't believe the Insurrection Act is gonna be used because of homie's swasticars

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

"Resist" is a tired slogan of the paid-to-lose Democrats, and the last time I saw it surface as "angry-Leftist vandalism" in pluto-fash corporate media propaganda, it turned out to be a Republican trying to cover up insurance fraud. They are too incurious to understand the difference between antifa and liberals.

Kool-aid-drinking Tesla dealers are losing their shirts because Glorious Leader locked them into bad contracts and is now poisoning the brand; they have AMPLE incentive to destroy their own property and play victim.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago (3 children)

As a reminder, Tesla is "direct to consumer" and the "dealership" is corporate owned!

So when the party of conspiracy theorists claims conspiracy against them, you can rest assured it's a conspiracy by them.

But that's what they'd say if the the tables were turned, so fuck 'em and their shit. I hope the insurance adjuster finds a way out and leaves them holding the bag.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

I don't care who burns 'em. So long as they're burnt.

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί