this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
193 points (99.5% liked)

News

27684 readers
4488 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump's administration's response to a judicial request for more details on timing of deportation flights carrying hundreds of Venezuelan migrants was "woefully insufficient," a judge said on Thursday, accusing officials of evading their responsibilities under an order he issued.

Washington-based U.S. District Judge James Boasberg is weighing whether administration officials violated his March 15 order intended to temporarily block the expulsions. In a new order on Thursday, the judge told Justice Department officials to explain by next Tuesday why the administration's failure to bring the deported migrants back to the United States did not violate his order.

Boasberg's order on Thursday escalates his dispute with the administration that has raised concerns among Trump critics and some legal experts about a potentially looming constitutional crisis if the administration defies judicial decisions.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)

FUCKING STFU AND DO SOMETHING.

WHAT THE FUCK.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Sure. What?

I'd like to know what the courts can do.

Seriously.

Or even Congress.

The whole system is predicated on the idea that the executive follows the rule of law, as they are entrusted by us to execute the law.

If the executive fails to do their job, it's on Congress to impeach.

Congress should work in good faith too...but if they are complicit with the executive?

Judicials job isn't to write law or police the president. Judicials job is to make sure that the laws are, themselves, legal, and to extract the nuance out of the law and apply it to the context of the situation.

The judicial has no teeth. Nor are they supposed to. Congress makes the laws, executive enforces, and judicial essentially mediates. That's it.

Turns out the entire system goes tits up if one branch decides "I don't wanna" and the ones that are supposed to give him the boot are instead giving him applause.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They order those in charge to bring the detainees back immediately, and if they don’t do it, the judges dispatch the US Marshalls to arrest them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

US Marshal Office is part of DoJ that runs under executive.

They gonna arrest their bosses boss? Or even defy orders from their own chain-of-command? How do you think that will turn out?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If the U.S. Marshals won't do it, then deputize someone who will.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Do you know what a deputy is?

Deputies cannot have any more authority than their deputor...depututor ...deputizer....you know what I'm trying to say.

Sherrifs and bailiffs authority outside the courtroom is essentially no more than serving papers, which will immediately be tossed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

That’s the question. That’s when we find out whether a constitutional crisis is the order of the day.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago

to arrest them

to arrest whom?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago (2 children)

We are getting close to the tipping point people....

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Judges "handling" trump in a nutshell. Just like parents who don't follow through with "I'm gonna count to 3! 1....2....2 and a half...." etc. If you don't follow through with disciplining misbehaving children, the children don't learn anything.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Can we just get it over with, please?

This whole year so far has been like watching a trainwreck. From the quiet-car. Like oh there's this cool disaster going on up ahead...it's definitely going to hurt everyone around me directly, but damn if it isn't mesmerizing in the meantime. And meanwhile the guy on my left is taking a nap and the girl on the right is reading a true crime novel about horny vampires (the author may have taken some creative liberties).

[–] Darkassassin07 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Judicial response to administrative defiance 'woefully insufficient', public says.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Seems like the way to defeat the justice system is to stick your fingers into your ears and repeat yadayadayada....

Oh, and be the POTUS and be surrounded by cowards.