this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
33 points (88.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

2715 readers
36 users here now

There is no such thing as a Stupid Question!

Don't be embarrassed of your curiosity; everyone has questions that they may feel uncomfortable asking certain people, so this place gives you a nice area not to be judged about asking it. Everyone here is willing to help.


Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca still apply!


Thanks for reading all of this, even if you didn't read all of this, and your eye started somewhere else, have a watermelon slice πŸ‰.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

i need this resolved. Let's see the answers.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If you dare to be wrong, sure!

See Betteridge's law of headlines: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no."

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

From today's BBC front page:

  • Why are thousands of people protesting in Turkey? NO!
  • How often should you wash your feet? NO!

[–] masterspace 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

In the case of the first one, it's really a statement phrased as a question. The headline would more accurately be:

Here's why thousands of people are protesting in Turkey

In the case of the second the answer is still the negative / null case, i.e:

It doesn't really matter how often you wash your feet

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

For news/article headlines, I estimate 90% are No, if they are Yes/No questions. The reason is, the author had nothing interesting/new to tell, but needs to bait people to visit the news site to make money.

However, this Wiki page has some actual studies about it, not just my personal estimate: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headlines

Also, there's a new trend of adding "Here's why" to the end of headlines of really bad news articles.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

β€œHere’s why” is basically a red flag for me. DO NOT READ THIS TRIPE!

[–] morbidcactus 2 points 4 weeks ago

"They thought they would be informed, then they read the headline"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago

Can they? Yes. Will they all be accurate? No.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago

It’s a fun game, but I’ve seen enough counter examples that I don’t rely on it as a definitive guide.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago

I heard someone clarify that it's not so much answering with the word no, as it is dismissing the implication of the headline. In most cases that's a no, but it's easy enough to flip the meaning.

If the heading is avoiding making a statement, it's because the statement is false/unsupported.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago
[–] Yoga 4 points 4 weeks ago

Does this headline count?

Because ironically the answer to the question is also likely the answer to most of said headlines:

Mostly no but here's the nuance...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

Another reason why a title might use a question is to prevent spoilers. For example: Has Ferrari let down their fans again in the Chinese GP? (Yes)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

I think the joke got lost on many commenters here.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere 3 points 4 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago