this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
1153 points (99.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

30395 readers
5297 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

They were very into helium and balloons

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Literally just build a bridge, you hyper-individualistic consumer-centric assholes.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fucking horse in the background 💀

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, it's just a water-walking horse.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

A Balloon Supported Water Walking Horse...BSWWH for short. Pronounced bsh!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

I do like how it has the sensibilities at the time. Being super dangerous to anyone who uses it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm glad we got ubiquitous smartphones instead of only rich people having flying cars.

Still, I'm promoting way, way more punk in our cyberpunk.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

The rich do have flying cars. They just call them private jets. The rich own mansions (huge houses) all over the world, private islands, mega yachts that contain smaller yachts, their own submarines, and now they even have their own rocket ships

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The two Jesuses in the background don't have balloons!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

They're on a carriage that's like pontooned at the bottom, being pulled by the horse and driver who each have their own balloons.

edit oh wait d'you mean the ones in the back right my bad dk about them

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Back right?

I see two in the back left and two more in the back middle without balloons. The two in the back right are the carriage passengers.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

I feel ripped off yet again!

[–] [email protected] 73 points 3 days ago (5 children)

We do have the technology for this... right?

[–] [email protected] 121 points 3 days ago (18 children)

Absolutely, but the scale of the balloons is a bit off. Nobody would be walking shoulder to shoulder like this. For a normal-ish 170lb/77kg individual your personal balloon would have to be a little under 6.5 meters across assuming it were filled with helium.

Yes, I did the math.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You did the basic math, with your spherical balloon. What about giant cylinders? Then you could really pack it in.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Sure. You could do a cylinder of three quarters of a meter across which seems like a reasonable footprint for someone to stand in. That'd only have to be, uh, 325.5 meters tall to have the same volume.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Hot air balloon pilot here: We do, indeed.

This is a "Cloudhopper". It's a hot air balloon with no basket: The pilot straps a propane tank to his back and wears a climbing harness. As you can see, the pilot is, effectively, walking on water with the assistance of the balloon.

Cloudhoppers are about 20,000 to 35,000 cubic feet, 40-50 feet in diameter. They are about 1/3 to 1/2 the size of most of the balloons you might see at a fair or festival.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Not sure how they are walking and not just splashing in place.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And you don't have an issue with the carriage, with three people on it, where the only balloon is on the horse?

Whoever made this was an artist and sucked at physics

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

If we had spent the time working on the real problems, this would have already been solved.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Forget the balloons. I want that water treadmill unicycle!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (23 children)

I love that the balloons are far too small. Like they didn't understand the elements and buoyancy well enough to know the balloons have to be much larger. Not like we have negative mass particles.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Obviously they were assuming balloons were filled with supervacuum. We have had 100 years and not invented even that.

Truly we have failed our ancestors.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Deutscher Kakao" 🤡

"German cocoa"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

ah so german cacao is the red bull of the 1900s, it gives you wings.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Now I'm wondering why we don't attach giant balloons to ships to reduce water resistance by cutting down how much of the ship needs to be underwater. Perhaps it's because you would need more size for the balloon, and maybe the air resistance and water resistance needs to even out due to physical laws that I'm too lazy to think about?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

attach giant balloons to ships

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sounds like you're vaguely describing a ground effect vehicle, basically a plane which coasts along the water. They're more efficient than actually flying due to exploiting the ground effect on the lift surfaces, but ultimately it's closer to a plane than a boat

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The boat already floats. What is the point of making it lighter? Boats are handy for transporting extreme weights because water weighs more than air.

If it should fly then get a Zepplin

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Any amount of water contact introduces a fair amount of drag. There may be an ideal point somewhere in the middle, but I think if you take this to it's natural conclusion you get a zeppelin.

I did a little bit of math and I think that to lift the payload capacity (including fuel and crew) of a modern day Panama canal ship you would need about a tenth of the peak U.S. helium reserve (a cube about half a kilometer long on each edge, about 1.3x longer than the long dimension of the ship)

I don't think you'd get the best fuel efficiency going upwind lol

Anything smaller would come with proportionally less downsides and at least proportionally less benefits. I doubt it could ever be a net positive in any useful metric.

[–] humanspiral 2 points 1 day ago

Hydrogen for sure. Partial lift for a boat has a lot of applications. Much more cargo than an airship, with no complications in flying empty. A fairly flat triangular "balloon" can be used as a solar platform, a sail, and be put in neutral wind mode down to the deck.

load more comments
view more: next ›