this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
287 points (99.7% liked)

Feminism

1983 readers
4 users here now

Feminism, women's rights, bodily autonomy, and other issues of this nature. Trans and sex worker inclusive.

See also this community's sister subs LGBTQ+, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC

Also check out our sister community on lemmy:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

A lot of the anti-feminism stuff aimed at young men are massive strawmans.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Back to blaming each other? Have you missed the billionaires buying up newspapers and supporting fascist political parties around the world?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Disagree. People would not have turned to the far right in the 2010s if we had done feminism better. Small changes in strategy would have gone a long way -- like being more welcoming to straight white men in the 4th wave feminist movement. In contrast, people turning to feminism at that same time was inevitable, since the status quo was (and is) racist, anti-feminist, and anti-lgbt.

This post is just an attempt to not own up to how the left could have been smarter and done better.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Imo, both can be true and both are true. It's a vicious cycle. In a general sense, women are tired of men and men are tired of women.

It's so obvious to everyone that far-right men are driving women to the left that it's not even worth mentioning in the midst of well adjusted, moderate people. It's a fact that normal people kind of just intrinsically know. Ask literally anyone who doesn't own a MAGA hat if they think far-right men are driving women to the left and they'll probably respond with something along the lines of "uhhh yeah... no fucking duh?"

Amongst well adjusted men, accepting responsibility for their role in social issues is the status quo. Every man I know who still has color in their hair puts a conscious effort toward avoiding problematic behavior and rectifying the issues their fathers and grandfathers perpetuated. There is universal acknowledgement of the situation at hand.

You know what I almost never see? I almost never see women acknowledge that they too play a part in this awful dynamic that affects all of us. Granted, in the past 2 years I have known women who acknowledge that the problem does indeed affect society as a whole. But never do I see an acknowledgement of mutual culpability. It's still always framed as something men are doing that they could stop at any moment if they choose.

I mentioned the status quo amongst normal people. The reason the idea that women are pushing men to the right triggers such a response is because this idea is in opposition to the status quo, and this has got to change because it is definitely true. Young men are tired of the callousness toward their very real issues, tired of being made to feel like villains, and they are eager to be in the company of people who value them.

I'm firmly left wing. Not nearly tankie level but much further than the average milquetoast socdem. I really truly do not feel welcome here. I'm here because I've developed strong opinions that persist IN SPITE of how unwelcome I feel in leftism, feminism, and progressivism in general. Young men who are freshly sentient and just starting to form opinions will absolutely be swayed by the emotions they are made to feel when interacting with more opinionated people.

I know that most people will not read more than the first quarter of this message without writing me off as right wing or saying "oh boo hoo poor men nobody cares" or it will be assumed that I'm writing this to inflame. I'm not. I'm writing this because I love people so fucking much and it breaks my heart on a daily basis to see this rift growing larger and larger more and more rapidly. Every individual of every gender is at fault here. Our society is deeply sick. We need to escape our echo chambers and have some real talk. Trying to weigh who is more evil and who is more good is futile, useless, and only serves as a distraction from our healing. Please get it straight: We all fucking suck. The only thing we can do now is try to understand each other and foster real compassion. Posting snide tweets offers temporary relief but it helps nothing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This rant hat got me thinking, and I feel like many points you make should in fact be considered more.

Thank you for taking the risk of sticking out your neck and stating this in public.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Really appreciate you reading and replying. Sometimes I just gotta rant. Usually I type up a page or two in my local editor and delete it right after, just for the relief, but I decided to actually post this time.

Thank you for taking the risk of sticking out your neck and stating this in public.

In our society it seems to me that we have two parallel status quos. I'm acutely aware of how criticizing either can bring down the ire of the faction it belongs to, but you know... I'm over it. If being called names and being made out as a bad person is the risk, I'm okay with that. Saying nothing (or saying only what everyone else is saying) and watching our reality dissolve is more painful. I trust that there are enough people who will see that I'm coming from a place of compassion and positive hope for the future. Either way, we should know full well that whatever we've been trying isn't working. We need a new discourse, really badly. The right is winning, not because hate is so attractive, but because they are offering a real sense of in-group belonging when the left is not.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Young men are turning to alt right because young need have no role models or support systems.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

They have role models... they're just horrible ones. The tates and Petersons realized they could exploit that void and do it purposefully

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Maybe making supporting a family impossible with less than 4 incomes was a bad idea?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do we actually know which version is correct though?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why does one have to be correct? It seems like both are happening.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I don't know, maybe both are correct indeed. It's just that the post seems to be making a point that only one of the statements is true and I was wondering whether we actually know that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

well i used to believe that feminism would actually improve the living conditions of women. now i'm not so sure anymore.

partially that is because of the economic outlook. i have a bad view of the economy in the next 10+ years and deeply believe in a recession. (not because of what Trump is doing, i already held that stance before). women in employment is a phenomenon of the last 55 years, really, starting in 1970, not because women finally liberated themselves, but because the economy (i.e. big companies) launched a psyops to manipulate women to work, because that increases the number of available workers, and by the principle of the market a higher supply in workers leads to falling prices (wages) for human labor. i have that view because i'm disillusioned how much stuff happens in the US purely or mostly because of the economy's meddling with things.

i mean, they overthrew governments to get cheaper fucking bananas. who says they wouldn't launch a few "women's magazines" and radio interviews to incite women to go to work?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

but i'm deviating from the post:

the social contract is an implicit contract that says that people take care of each other. it is the thing that defines society, and without it, there is no society. so it must be upheld. i'm pretty sure that the social conflict that "feminism" has started - that says that "all man are bad" - is a severe damaging to the social contract.

and i just want to note, that if the social contract breaks, civil war might be a consequence, and as always in any war, women would suffer the most.