this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
87 points (98.9% liked)

politics

20522 readers
3620 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The White House on Tuesday bashed House Republicans for pursuing “handouts” for pharmaceutical companies to highlight its announcement of the first 10 drugs chosen for Medicare price negotiation under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).

“[A]s the Biden Administration takes these newest historic actions to lower drug costs for Americans and strengthen Medicare, congressional Republicans continue to side with Big Pharma’s price gouging and cuts to Medicare benefits instead,” White House spokesman Andrew Bates wrote in a memo.

“Not only do congressional Republicans want to take the new benefits being announced today away from Americans with repeal legislation — they are even siding with Big Pharma’s lawsuits to stop them in their tracks,” he wrote.

The drugs, announced Tuesday by the White House, were chosen based on their eligibility under the Inflation Reduction Act, which President Biden signed into law in a year ago. They account for $50.5 billion in total gross Medicare Part D costs.

Negotiations over these drugs will take place in 2023 and 2024, and drugmakers have until Oct. 1 to sign agreements, according to the law. However, industry groups are seeking an injunction by that date amid various legal efforts to block the law entirely. Even if it goes forward as planned, actual savings would not kick in until 2026.

In his memo, Bates noted that Republicans have floated trying to repeal Biden’s plan to let Medicare negotiate lower drug costs, pointing to the 2022 midterms when some Republicans said an agenda item would be to claw back the law.

He said doing so would benefit only big pharmaceutical companies and contrasted the GOP economic agenda to Biden’s economic agenda, dubbed Bidenomics.

“The handouts congressional Republicans are pursuing for Big Pharma would explode our deficit, weaken Medicare, and subject more American seniors and families to price gouging for life-saving medicines,” Bates wrote.

“Across the board, the hallmark of congressional Republicans’ trickle-down economic agenda is to increase costs and financial burdens shouldered by hardworking Americans in exchange for welfare payoffs to the super rich and multinational corporations. In this case, Big Pharma.”

“We should be bolstering Medicare’s ability to lower drug costs for families, instead of trying to erase them,” he added.

Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-Va.), among the GOP critics of the drug negotiations, said in a hearing in June the plan is “an unconstitutional taking” and it will likely face challenges in the courts, in light of a Merck lawsuit against the drug pricing provision.

Ahead of the midterm elections, Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas) said repealing the law could be a GOP agenda item “because those drug provisions are so dangerous, by discouraging investment in life-saving cures,” Axios reported at the time.

Later Tuesday, Biden is expected to give a speech to mark the selection of the drugs.


archive link: https://archive.is/wip/dx3px

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


“[A]s the Biden Administration takes these newest historic actions to lower drug costs for Americans and strengthen Medicare, congressional Republicans continue to side with Big Pharma’s price gouging and cuts to Medicare benefits instead,” White House spokesman Andrew Bates wrote in a memo.

“Not only do congressional Republicans want to take the new benefits being announced today away from Americans with repeal legislation — they are even siding with Big Pharma’s lawsuits to stop them in their tracks,” he wrote.

The drugs, announced Tuesday by the White House, were chosen based on their eligibility under the Inflation Reduction Act, which President Biden signed into law in a year ago.

“The handouts congressional Republicans are pursuing for Big Pharma would explode our deficit, weaken Medicare, and subject more American seniors and families to price gouging for life-saving medicines,” Bates wrote.

“Across the board, the hallmark of congressional Republicans’ trickle-down economic agenda is to increase costs and financial burdens shouldered by hardworking Americans in exchange for welfare payoffs to the super rich and multinational corporations.

Ahead of the midterm elections, Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas) said repealing the law could be a GOP agenda item “because those drug provisions are so dangerous, by discouraging investment in life-saving cures,” Axios reported at the time.


The original article contains 456 words, the summary contains 207 words. Saved 55%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!