this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
491 points (99.4% liked)

News

28700 readers
6491 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The big American tech firms known as the “Silicon Six” have been accused of paying almost $278bn (£211bn) less corporate income tax in the past decade compared with the statutory rate for US companies making the same profits.

Amazon, Meta, Alphabet, Netflix, Apple and Microsoft generated $11tn of revenue and $2.5tn of profits over the past 10 years.

Yet they paid an average 18.8% in combined national and federal corporation taxes, compared with an average 29.7% in the US, according to the Fair Tax Foundation (FTF), which said the Silicon Six had “hardwired” tax avoidance into their business models.

Analysis by the not-for-profit organisation found that if one-off repatriation tax payments in the US connected to historical tax avoidance were excluded, the average corporate income tax contribution of the six firms fell to 16.1% over the past decade.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago

I would have to work for 514 million years to earn what one of the silicone six avoided paying in taxes.

Eat them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

I don't think that's any where close enough.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

But they'll audit the people making less than 200k because they can't afford to hire lawyers to effectively fight back.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 20 hours ago

Biden had hired up IRS agents specifically to go after these people and companies. Trump fired them all so the IRS is gonna have to go after the poors.

USA 💪

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Now do their CEOs ...

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago

Well, no fucking shit.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wow, I'd say that's unbelievable but it is completely believable. Those sums of money are really beyond my comprehension though

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

A Billion here and a Billion there, pretty soon it adds up to real money.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Call Elon and his DOGE muskrats. They'll fix it!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 22 hours ago

Their whole job is to make sure you don't notice shit like this and instead focus on chaos they're creating for small fish

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago

...that's IT?! These fuckers should be paying BILLIONS MORE.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

Go back and add inflation and interest over the last decade… then fine them for not paying their responsible share, when it was due, to deter future violation and prevent other companies from doing the same.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago

Oscar: Listen, I would love to have an honest conversation with management about ethics. Why isn’t the company doing better? Mmm… it could be the pad of Post-its I took home last week. Or it could be the twelve million dollars in deferred compensation in stock options they paid the CEO for a year of substandard performance. I’m sure we’ll cover both in the seminar.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  1. Boycott and talk to others around you as to why you are boycotting.

  2. Create fake amazing resumes, apply for high-level jobs at Starbucks, Amazon, etc.

  3. Waste their time with interviews, then bail out. Tell them you changed your mind because they have a toxic reputation.

  4. If you already work for one of these corporations, sabotage their operations. There's manuals out there on how to conduct sabotage, but it can be as simple as relaying the wrong day or time for meetings to waste everyone's time, or finding things that are not exactly according to policy and making a big deal about the importance of following policy to the letter, etc.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

TFW when it’s called the ‘Silicon Six’ but Intel isn’t even on the list

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

I reckon they wanted something that sounded like “the Sinister Six” for maximum headline clickbaitiness

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I mean, Silicon Seven is right there and preserves the allitteration..

Unless it's about six sounding like sex or something stupid like that, I agree that there's no reason to exclude the "grande dame" of Silicon Valley fuckery..

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Why is Microsoft on that list?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So are they alleging fraud? The article seems to be making the companies out to be the bad guys, but it sounds more like the governments writing tax code to encourage this.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You're arguing as if tax cuts and loopholes in the tax code are ok, but they're not. Just look at what Reagan did and tell me it's all good.

The first tax cut (Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981) among other things, cut the highest personal income tax rate from 70% to 50% and the lowest from 14% to 11% and decreased the highest capital gains tax rate from 28% to 20%.

The second tax cut (Tax Reform Act of 1986) among other things, cut the highest personal income tax rate from 50% to 38.5% but decreasing to 28% in the following years and increased the highest capital gains tax rate from 20% to 28%.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reagan_tax_cuts

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm not saying it's okay, I'm saying we shouldn't be expecting companies to act ethically. They will avoid as much tax as possible, so we should focus on lobbying governments to change the tax law to reduce avoidance and increase tax liability.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We should be demanding they act ethically. The hell the rules should be different for them than for us.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago

We can demand anything we want. The reality is that's never going to happen. Want a change? Change the laws. Make it so they can't do it.

Good luck with that though. The government is screwed at this point.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Perhaps I'm misunderstanding, but it sounds like you have a strange set of values. You have incredibly greedy companies mostly owned by incredibly greedy billionaires who are doing their best to take every single penny they possibly can, and according to you that's not bad.

Or, to put it another way, you wrote that the government tax code encourages this. What section of the tax code asks billionaires to take as much of our money as possible? Where is that written? What paragraph says, steal their money, go do it, it's good!?