this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
802 points (99.8% liked)

politics

23339 readers
3109 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

These goddamned idiots are going to get at least one supercarrier sunk. At least one.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

You can be horrified by the lack of security and its implications, or you can rejoice in the rampant stupidity that will be on display when the leaks begin.

Emojis, ALL CAPS, general cluelessness, the JD Vance “I don’t know about this, but whatever” comments.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Who could have seen this coming /s

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Release em!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sign up for free access to this post

Any copy of the article that doesn't want my personal info?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I guess this means they'll stop trying to fire all their aides because the leaks are coming from outside the house!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

How long until these walking disgraces decide truth social has enough encryption and start using that platform instead?

... Oh fuck.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It uses client side encryption, so that shouldn't impact confidentiality

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The password is "Ivanka696"

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, the keys are PFS and randomly generated by the app. Encryption uses double ratchet. The seed is in the TPM and cannot be extracted.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›