this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
744 points (98.2% liked)

politics

23594 readers
3198 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I love all the broken clock mfs in here. I’ll concede that everyone, including myself, thought he (and trump) were too old to be running because they’re both mentally declining in different ways.

We didn’t know of any obvious major health issues with Biden. He had a shit debate and everyone suddenly acts like they knew something was wrong other than just getting old, being propped up on cold meds or whatever the official excuse was. Prostate cancer doesn’t cause these symptoms.

That said, the big question would be whether or not it was known he had cancer and was getting treatment for it, the effects of treatment certainly would be hard on someone mentally, their mental capabilities, and physically. Hiding that shit and running him for office again would be fucked up.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

We didn’t know of any obvious major health issues with Biden. He had a shit debate and everyone suddenly acts like they knew something was wrong other than just getting old, being propped up on cold meds or whatever the official excuse was. Prostate cancer doesn’t cause these symptoms.

Sure, no one would have known about the prostate cancer, but plenty of people had been questioning Biden's mental fitness since 2020, and they were called ageist by pundits. Stewart himself was accused of aiding Trump for running a segment on Biden's strange mental gaffes just weeks before the debate. If people like Tapper had been doing their jobs instead of deferring to the administration, we would have had answers, not questions.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, I strongly remember being called a useful idiot for wanting a better canidate than Biden after the horrid debate performance, with every time being deflected to "But did you see Trump?? Clearly Biden can stop him now!!"

If Jon fucking Stewart was called ageist and a Russian bot because he accurately saw that Biden was not doing too well, its no wonder people called other fellow humans that too. I'm not shocked Apollo is trying to lie by omission of "We didn’t know of any obvious major health issues with Biden" besides being in the most stressful job in America and being the oldest person in that poisition.

But instead Biden went on "full" steam ahead, only keeping to his one term promise when internal polling showing he'd lose to Trump by 400 EC votes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

Yeah, we technically didn't know that he was cognitively impaired, but 80% of Americans said they thought he was too old and couldn't handle another term. We were all listening to the guy speak and thinking, "...I'm not a doctor, but that guy seems like he's struggling."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, the whole point of “he is too old” Is because 80 it’s too old. It is wether or not anyone had secret knowledge of Biden’s decline. It was a correct assessment, and his debate was just validation of what was already known

[–] [email protected] 6 points 19 hours ago

It wasn't just that. There was prior evidence because he made one appearance every two months under very controlled circumstances and even then he looked lost as shit, confused, wandering, and whenever he talked into a mic you only got thirty seconds of sense out of him before he'd ramble about nonsense.

[–] Auli 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Obviously being old and in mental decline is not something people have issues with. Look at your current president.

[–] [email protected] 255 points 1 day ago (20 children)

It's just bizarre how much drama around Bidens declining health, which is normal for a person of his age. But not a single peep about massive corruption by Trump, dismissal of laws and actual criminal shit like sexual assault of women.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 21 hours ago

This isn't, "drama around Bidens declining health," it's another symptom of a sickness within the Democratic party. Ruth Bader Ginsberg refused to retire when Obama was in office, so her death gave Donald Trump another Supreme Court nomination. Dianne Feinstein would not leave office despite having severe dementia, and instead died during her term. Jerry Connolly was made Democratic Chair of the House Oversight Committee despite being diagnosed with esophageal cancer. He died yesterday, made him the third House Democrat to die in the last 2 months.

The Democratic Party is led by geriatrics who refuse to relinquish power even as they drop dead in office. We should drag every single person who knew about Biden's failing mental state into the light and make sure they never work in politics again. We should demand to know if his cancer diagnosis was known before the election, and if not, why he didn't receive a cancer screening for over a decade. We need accountability for the people who allowed the party to reach this state. And before 2026, we need to go to every single House and Senate Democrat over the age of 65 and say, "Thank you for your service, but you're retiring now. Would you like to endorse anyone for your seat?"

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jon Stewart, in particular, talks about Trump's corrupt and illegal activities on a regular basis and has been doing so for a long time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

"But you see he also had moral consistency and called out Biden's issues, therefore he's guilty of enabling Trump!"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

That's an incredibly frustrating problem.

I have a fairly technical background. How technical? When you mention Black-Scholes to people you get a variety of responses.
Most people just say, "WTF are you talking about? Why doesn't that guy just wipe his feet?"
Finance-curious people may have looked it up on Wikipedia.
Actual finance professionals may get excited and talk about, "the Greeks".
I'm the kind of nerd who went through the entire derivation from fundamental concepts like the stochastic discount factor and then had to compare the calculated and observed convexity of utility functions to rediscover the equity premium puzzle.

Many Democrats are happy to listen to me shred the economic "theories" that Trump blathers on about and are very satisfied to see proofs that their numbers don't actually work in real math. Many of those same people absolutely loose their shit at the implication that Democratic policies are anything less than perfect.

Don't get me wrong. Trumps economic and foreign relations policies are absolute monkey turds and I'll never get tired of throwing them in the toilet, where they belong. At the same time, hypocrisy doesn't do Democrats any favors.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Did you literally wake up from a coma the day Biden's cancer diagnosis was announced or something? Or are you the rare person who isn't part of Trump's cult but also only watches right wing news sources?

"President Trump shits on Constitution in novel way!" could paraphrase a headline from literally any week this year after 1/20. And only after 1/20 because before then he was merely President-Elect Trump.

Beyond that, the news cycle is pretty short - for example, unless we have revelations about Trump sexually assaulting a woman we didn't already know about or some movement in an existing court case, it's not going to continue to be litigated in the news media because there's nothing new to say.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago

I see multiple articles about Trump's corrupt and illegal actions every single day.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It goes far beyond conspiracy theories at this point: Most major media outlets and centralized social media platforms in the world are sanewashing the entire conservative bloc in America.

They're literally copying Germany in the 1930s, with secret police, sending people to camp based on ethnicity(For all those who seem to not know: Dachau concentration camp was opened in 1933, thousands held there by 1934), etc. Elon Musk did a full blow, Hitler style Nazi salute on stage during the inaugration celebration, twice. And all the media, including pages like Snopes, are acting like "It's impossible to tell what he actually meant".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Front Burner just did a podcast about all of this and how is similar with Nazi Germany. Mostly helps that this isn't an American news outlet (it's Canadian, part of CBC) about how they honestly spoke about it (Trump can't threaten to take away their broadcasting license)

Today on the show is historian Timothy Ryback. Timothy is an author and writer with The Atlantic. He’s the director of the Institute for Historical Justice and Reconciliation in The Hague. Last year he published ‘Takeover’ which documents the ways Hitler and his enablers in the German establishment cleared the pathway to Nazism through constitutional means. He’s on the show to discuss - what he refers to as the “disturbing echoes” between Nazi Germany and contemporary America. Particularly between Adolf Hitler and US President Donald Trump.

[–] [email protected] 118 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

Pretty sure Stewart's point is exactly that. They're putting out a book now to have "content" instead of going after trump for the real content. Like Puppy-Killer Noem, his secretary of Homeland Security not knowing Habeas Corpus. or, blatantly stating the exact opposite before a congressional hearing.

the stuff in CNN's book was news years ago- and they talked about it years ago, too. CNN is complicit

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 day ago (3 children)

My wife said the same thing about the Bob Woodward books.

https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/The-Woodward-Trilogy/Bob-Woodward/9781982198916

Do the reporting FIRST, THEN do the book tour!

Roll back to Watergate, it was a news story FIRST, then a book.

Or the excellent reporting by David Cay Johnston - report that shit first THEN write the book.

https://www.penguinrandomhouse.ca/books/291700/perfectly-legal-by-david-cay-johnston/9781591840695

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think the Washington Post of today would print an article with dirt on the president.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago

Oh, you know they would not, nor the LA Times, or the New York Times.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›