this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2021
104 points (99.1% liked)

Privacy

33192 readers
317 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Most of the Apps that appear in the "safe" category aren't the ones that first come to mind when thinking about privacy respecting services^^ I mean MS, Google, Netflix, Discord...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago

Yeah, take that with a grain of salt, definitely, but I'm just relaying what the article says.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 years ago

I think another factor needs to be counted here, ecosystem they are attached to. That would rule out GAFTMAN immediately, leaving stuff like Discord or Shein.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 years ago (2 children)

I can't see WhatsApp and Telegram in there. Were they not contemplated or are they actually better that these (doubt)?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago (1 children)

WhatsApp existed in an earlier version of this table, or a similar one some other group made. It was like bottom 3 or 5 IIRC.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

"Whatsapp" in latin means "stealing of data", that's why it isn't in that table

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

getting really tired of these linear models and scales. people are ending up so worried about which is /more/ invasive or /worse/ for privacy and it just makes a lot of noise that doesn't really help anyone and doesn't give a good picture of whats happening.

the modern business model of these corporations is just to funnel data to threat actors. that's all they do, from any major social media platform, to any provided service, they're just malware now funneling data to threat actors. there's no way to guarantee where that information goes or what its used for.

its not really worth pointing out which is the biggest funnel for data to threat actors, its just understanding that they are funnels for data going to threat actors

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Interesting to see a company such a doordash doesn't share data the same way ubereatss does.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 years ago

Hmm, duolingo? Time to go then

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This site says Netflix tracks 0% of your data. If that were true they'd have no clue who watches what. Something is fishy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It says that Netflix doesn't share data with third parties, it could be they just use the data they collect internally to recommend more content

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Advertisers/Ad Measurement Companies: We may share information collected from or about you with Advertisers and/or Ad Measurement Companies to select advertisements, and measure and improve advertising effectiveness. As a reminder, please see the Information from Other Sources section above if you have questions regarding the role of Advertisers or Ad Measurement Companies.

From https://help.netflix.com/en/legal/privacy

They're definitely sharing the info externally.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

in other news--- watr is wet🤣🤣🤣

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

Surprised that Wechat isn't there but TikTok is. Does this mean that Wechat is actually privacy respecting?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 years ago

Since it isn't mentioned at all, maybe it just wasn't considered in the report.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

course not..🙄🙄